Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-03 Thread Dave Augustus
eidell a écrit : > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: Noc Phibee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 8:35 AM > >>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > >>> Subject: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on

Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-03 Thread JamesDR
Noc Phibee wrote: Hi i have 6 servers running on spamassassin 3.1.7 (now after a upgrades). Actually, all have Bayes Filering with local Db (default db, not sql) I want know what is the best choice ? : - Default Db or MySQL db ? - 1 Bayes Db per server or 1 Bayes on Sql for all serv

Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-02 Thread Nigel Frankcom
Nigel Frankcom; SpamAssassin >> Subject: Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin >> >> >> What you seem to have missed in the conversation is that there is a >> *single* bayes backend.. > >What you misses is his QUESTION about 'Best Choice' (as

RE: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Craig Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 3:08 PM > To: Michael Scheidell > Cc: Nigel Frankcom; SpamAssassin > Subject: Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin > > > What you

Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-02 Thread Craig Morrison
Michael Scheidell wrote: -Original Message- From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 2:24 PM To: SpamAssassin Subject: Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin My MTA has a list of SA servers it will use in series; if 1 is

Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-02 Thread Nigel Frankcom
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:27:57 -0500, "Michael Scheidell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 2:24 PM >> To: SpamAssassin >> Subject: Re: B

RE: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 2:24 PM > To: SpamAssassin > Subject: Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin > > My MTA has a list of SA servers it will use in series; if 1 >

Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-02 Thread Nigel Frankcom
;>> -Original Message- >>> From: Noc Phibee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 8:35 AM >>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >>> Subject: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin >>> >>> >&

RE: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Noc Phibee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 12:32 PM > To: Michael Scheidell > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org; Wazir Shpoon > Subject: Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin > > > Thank

Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-02 Thread Noc Phibee
@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin Hi i have 6 servers running on spamassassin 3.1.7 (now after a upgrades). Actually, all have Bayes Filering with local Db (default db, not sql) I want know what is the best choice ? : - Default Db or

RE: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Noc Phibee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 8:35 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin > > > Hi > > i have 6 servers running on s

Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin

2006-12-02 Thread Noc Phibee
Hi i have 6 servers running on spamassassin 3.1.7 (now after a upgrades). Actually, all have Bayes Filering with local Db (default db, not sql) I want know what is the best choice ? : - Default Db or MySQL db ? - 1 Bayes Db per server or 1 Bayes on Sql for all server (same database)