The value of the Return-Path and the Reply-To in the messages are
identical but the headers are different. Is this important?
Perhaps you could just copy the messages to 'spam' and 'ham' IMAP
folders, rather than resending them. I think that preserves all
headers, and should be less resource int
Jim Ficarra wrote:
I did a quick test to see the differences.
The original has a Return-Path header, the forwarded attachment does
not.
The forwarded attachment has a Reply-To header that the original did
not.
The value of the Return-Path and the Reply-To in the messages are
identical but the he
again.
-Jim
-Original Message-
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bayesian Filtering/Resending from Outlook
> My question is this: When the message is resent some of the headers in
> the resent m
> My question is this: When the message is resent some of the headers in
> the resent message are different than the original message. Will
> sa-learn be learning something differently if it analyzes the resent
> message based on the fact that the headers are slightly different?
I would strongly
ent: Monday, September 13, 2004 2:51 PM
To: Jim Ficarra
Subject: Re: Bayesian Filtering/Resending from Outlook
Jim Ficarra wrote:
> I would like to setup a site wide spam filter using SpamAssassin. In
> addition to using the network rules, I would like to setup something
> where my users
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Ficarra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 1:37 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Bayesian Filtering/Resending from Outlook
>
>
> I would like to setup a site wide spam filter using
>
I would like to setup a site wide spam filter using SpamAssassin. In
addition to using the network rules, I would like to setup something
where my users can submit their messages for ham/spam to the system so
the Bayesian system can learn.
I read in the Wiki that you can redirect/bounce a message
