Leigh, I am VERY sure your Bayes has been severely mistrained if BAYES_00
hits on more spam than BAYES_99. There is no way this inversion should
be taking place. For me BAYES_99 is hitting almost 85% of all spam and
about 0.04% of messages later declared to be ham. (Although I've never
noticed it
Hi all,
Bayes seems to be missing quite a lot of spam. I'm getting these
results quite often:
Email:63252 Autolearn: 26740 AvgScore: 14.53 AvgScanTime: 1.69 sec
Spam: 51232 Autolearn: 23252 AvgScore: 21.08 AvgScanTime: 1.68 sec
Ham: 12020 Autolearn: 3488 AvgScore: -
Hi
all,
Bayes seems to
be missing quite a lot of spam. I'm getting these results quite
often:
TOP SPAM RULES
FIRED--RANK
RULE
NAME
COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM
%OFHAM--
