On 30 Sep 2004 at 9:00, Chip Paswater wrote:
> Does a human review the scores generated by the statistics engine?
>
> Doesn't it make sense to have more of a bell curve on the 2nd set of bayes
> scores?
>
> If not, why not?
>
> The teeth seem seem to be taken out of BAYES_99 with it's low 1.9 s
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I was looking at the Bayes scores in 3.0 and had a couple of questions:
> [...]
>
>
> ... the FAQ ... read the FAQ ...
>
Great Bob, the FAQ says how the scores are generated, I surmised that.
But these questions aren't in the FAQ:
Does a human review the scores genera
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:34:28 -0700 Chip Paswater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I was looking at the Bayes scores in 3.0 and had a couple of questions:
[...]
... the FAQ ... read the FAQ ...
-- Bob
Hey guys,
I was looking at the Bayes scores in 3.0 and had a couple of questions:
score BAYES_00 0 0 -1.665 -2.599
score BAYES_05 0 0 -0.925 -0.413
score BAYES_20 0 0 -0.730 -1.951
score BAYES_40 0 0 -0.276 -1.096
score BAYES_50 0 0 1.567 0.001
score BAYES_60 0 0 3.515 0.372
score BAYE
