Re: AW: Bayes became to work very bad

Joerg Reisslein schrieb: Mit freundlichen Gru?en Do you have a link for the botnet plugin? $searchmachine "download botnet plugin spamassassin" http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/ Docs in tarball provide details for install. -- hth MH Dont send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Bayes became to work very bad

ut what about advice. What to do? Learn? > What to do with old BAYES-base? > > Roman > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-became-to-work-very-bad-tf3958378.html#a11232591 > Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

AW: Bayes became to work very bad

Mit freundlichen Gru?en Do you have a link for the botnet plugin? cheers > -Ursprungliche Nachricht- > Von: Roman Sozinov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2007 16:01 > An: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Bayes became t

Re: Bayes became to work very bad

Matthias Haegele-2 wrote: > > Use blacklists, the botnet plugin, SARE rules, sa-update ...? > upgrade to a newer SA release? > Thanks :) What about my BAYES base? delete it? Do it from new? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-became-to-work-very-bad-tf

Re: Bayes became to work very bad

t to do? Learn? What to do with old BAYES-base? Roman -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-became-to-work-very-bad-tf3958378.html#a11232591 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Bayes became to work very bad

Roman Sozinov schrieb: Matthias Haegele-2 wrote: You use sa-learn till now?. Some people suggest not to learn old spam/ham ... Think its pretty normal that bayes hits are not very good on new spam (spammer tweak their messages every day to slip the filters ...). Some new spam messages here on

Re: Bayes became to work very bad

ages here only get BAYES_00 ... > sa-learn sometimes use (~3 times in a week) So what about some advice? :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-became-to-work-very-bad-tf3958378.html#a11232378 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Bayes became to work very bad

n my bayes base there are: > spam_count - 17539 > ham_count - 4895 > token_count - 453505 > > Roman > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-became-to-work-very-bad-tf3958378.html#a11231927 > Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > !DSPAM:1,467a6f05135801198567559!

Re: Bayes became to work very bad

Roman Sozinov schrieb: I'm using spamassassin about 1 year and for that period I already have good BAYES tokens base. But about 2 weaks ago began something wrong - my system became to catch spam very bad. About 80% of spam have BAYES_50 score :( What's wrong? You use sa-learn till now?. Some pe

Bayes became to work very bad

ql backend (awl & bayes) In my bayes base there are: spam_count - 17539 ham_count - 4895 token_count - 453505 Roman -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-became-to-work-very-bad-tf3958378.html#a11231927 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.