On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:13:58AM +1200, BQ wrote:
> >Yep, it's gotta be -D bayes, not just -D
>
> Thanks - this works great. It would be good if this little thing gets
> included in the manual pages - it's either not there or I missed it
> (quite possible :).
fyi: http://wiki.apache.org/spamass
Matt,
On 5/10/07, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BQ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I had some false positives that also had BAYES_99 triggered.
>
> As I saved the original e-mail(s), I'd like to see what tokens
> actually caused this. Is it possible to do this with Spam Assassin
> 3.1.8?
spa
BQ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I had some false positives that also had BAYES_99 triggered.
>
> As I saved the original e-mail(s), I'd like to see what tokens
> actually caused this. Is it possible to do this with Spam Assassin
> 3.1.8?
spamassassin -D bayes < message.eml
>
> I vaguely remember that
Hi,
Recently I had some false positives that also had BAYES_99 triggered.
As I saved the original e-mail(s), I'd like to see what tokens
actually caused this. Is it possible to do this with Spam Assassin
3.1.8?
I vaguely remember that previously I ran spamassassin in debug mode
and that it show
