New to SA 3.2.4 running on Ubuntu 8.04. I noticed SA attaches an
analysis summary for all mails it detects as spam which is a nice
feature. However, I'm wondering if this impacts sa-learn? Can I simply
run sa-learn on mails that have the analysis attached? I also noticed
I'm not seeing Bayes pa
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 03:23:38AM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> I wonder why it is called "magic".
Because the data that is being dumped is from the metadata in the DB, which we
store using "magic" tokens, since they're tokens that can't possibly exist in
the
DB through normal means.
--
Ra
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> Matt Florido wrote:
>>> I'm not seeing Bayes participating in the scoring. Is
>>> this because it's new and my Bayes db hasn't been fully
>>> trained?
>>
>> Yes. You need 200 each ham and spam.
>
> You can use sa-learn to dump the database stats and see
> how many o
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Matt Florido wrote:
> > I'm not seeing Bayes participating in the scoring. Is this because it's
> > new and my Bayes db hasn't been fully trained?
>
> Yes. You need 200 each ham and spam.
You can use sa-learn to dump the database stats and see how many of
each have been
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:08:22AM -0700, Matt Florido wrote:
> feature. However, I'm wondering if this impacts sa-learn? Can I simply
> run sa-learn on mails that have the analysis attached? I also noticed
Yes. sa-learn removes markup before doing the processing.
> I'm not seeing Bayes part
New to SA 3.2.4 running on Ubuntu 8.04. I noticed SA attaches an
analysis summary for all mails it detects as spam which is a nice
feature. However, I'm wondering if this impacts sa-learn? Can I simply
run sa-learn on mails that have the analysis attached? I also noticed
I'm not seeing Bayes pa
