Re: Bayes autolearning: logarithmic?

2013-05-23 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 02:29 +0100, RW wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2013 20:44:58 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > > Is the autolearning supposed to accelerate? I can't help but feel > > > like it may just be feeding itself it's own data or something. > > > > There is no feedback loop in the learni

Re: Bayes autolearning: logarithmic?

2013-05-22 Thread RW
On Wed, 22 May 2013 20:44:58 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 11:34 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote: > > I set up Bayes with autolearning a few weeks ago. It took forever to > > get started, but now it seems like the learning speed has > > accelerated. > > > > Is the autolearni

Re: Bayes autolearning: logarithmic?

2013-05-22 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 11:34 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote: > I set up Bayes with autolearning a few weeks ago. It took forever to > get started, but now it seems like the learning speed has accelerated. > > Is the autolearning supposed to accelerate? I can't help but feel like > it may just be feedin

Bayes autolearning: logarithmic?

2013-05-22 Thread Andrew Talbot
Hey all - I set up Bayes with autolearning a few weeks ago. It took forever to get started, but now it seems like the learning speed has accelerated. Is the autolearning supposed to accelerate? I can't help but feel like it may just be feeding itself it's own data or something.

Re: Bayes Autolearning

2013-05-02 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 14:35 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote: > Thank you for that! > > Off-list you mentioned that you don't need to set the cron/expire because of > Redis features; why is it commented out here? Because it is a comment about a cron job, followed by an actual 'sa-learn' command. Comm

RE: Bayes Autolearning

2013-05-01 Thread Andrew Talbot
a day - then I could just manually mark them! :) > -Original Message- > From: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 6:24 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Bayes Autolearning > > On Wed, 01 May 2013 22:02:43 +010

Re: Bayes Autolearning

2013-05-01 Thread RW
On Wed, 01 May 2013 22:02:43 +0100 Steve Freegard wrote: > On 01/05/13 19:40, Andrew Talbot wrote: > > Hi, Seve - > > > > Thanks for your response. Is that just for performance reasons? > > > > Performance is one of the things that bayes_auto_learn_on_error 1 > will give you. It means that if th

Re: Bayes Autolearning

2013-05-01 Thread Steve Freegard
On 01/05/13 19:40, Andrew Talbot wrote: Hi, Seve - Thanks for your response. Is that just for performance reasons? Performance is one of the things that bayes_auto_learn_on_error 1 will give you. It means that if the message was already considered spam by Bayes, then the message won't be a

RE: Bayes Autolearning

2013-05-01 Thread Andrew Talbot
Hi, Seve - Thanks for your response. Is that just for performance reasons? > -Original Message- > From: Steve Freegard [mailto:steve.freeg...@fsl.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 2:24 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Bayes Autolearning >

RE: Bayes Autolearning

2013-05-01 Thread Andrew Talbot
sassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Bayes Autolearning > > On 05/01/2013 08:01 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote: > > > Any suggestions any of you have for a Bayes newbie - about what I just > > asked or otherwise - would be very much appreciated. > > I advocate autolearning as it h

Re: Bayes Autolearning

2013-05-01 Thread Steve Freegard
All good advice there from Axb; the only thing I'd add to that is: bayes_auto_learn_on_error 1 Which prevents Bayes from over-training when the classifier already agrees with what the autolearn is trying to train on. Cheers, Steve. On 01/05/13 19:14, Axb wrote: On 05/01/2013 08:01 PM, Andre

Re: Bayes Autolearning

2013-05-01 Thread Axb
On 05/01/2013 08:01 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote: Any suggestions any of you have for a Bayes newbie - about what I just asked or otherwise - would be very much appreciated. I advocate autolearning as it has always worked fine for me. Can take a bit longer to see good results but with some tuning

Bayes Autolearning

2013-05-01 Thread Andrew Talbot
Hey All - I'm about to set up Bayes on one of our mail servers. A lot of the documentation says that I need to manually sift through a few hundred messages and classify them to 'teach' the filter, and it sounds like I may need to do that on an ongoing basis. That is not a very plausible so

Re: Selectively disabling bayes autolearning

2005-08-09 Thread List Mail User
>... >Is it possible to selectively disable bayes autolearning? > >For example, I would like auto learning disabled for mail sent to >this mailing list since all this spam discussion and forwarded spam >snippets would probably pollute the bayses database (which probably &

Re: Selectively disabling bayes autolearning

2005-08-09 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 15:55, Steve Martin wrote: >Is it possible to selectively disable bayes autolearning? > >For example, I would like auto learning disabled for mail sent to >this mailing list since all this spam discussion and forwarded spam >snippets would probably pol

Re: Selectively disabling bayes autolearning

2005-08-09 Thread Jim Maul
Steve Martin wrote: Is it possible to selectively disable bayes autolearning? For example, I would like auto learning disabled for mail sent to this mailing list since all this spam discussion and forwarded spam snippets would probably pollute the bayses database (which probably thinks

Selectively disabling bayes autolearning

2005-08-09 Thread Steve Martin
Is it possible to selectively disable bayes autolearning? For example, I would like auto learning disabled for mail sent to this mailing list since all this spam discussion and forwarded spam snippets would probably pollute the bayses database (which probably thinks very highly of