>
> > Virus checker ... no idea. Sorry.
>
> I believe they use two Virus Scanners - One is ClamAV + Secondary ?
Sorry for replying to my own post, but secondary is reported to be
Sophos
> Virus checker ... no idea. Sorry.
I believe they use two Virus Scanners - One is ClamAV + Secondary ?
MB
>
> Several months later, a sales rep called and tried to sell me
> on it. I told him I wasn't interested in it as it stood, but
> might have some interest if they had an outbound scanner.
They have that capability now:
http://www.barracudanetworks.com/products/key_features_ob.php
Philipp Snizek wrote:
Sorry to get off-topic-ish here,
But could you tell us what Barracuda uses for:
- MTA
- Anti spam software
- Anti virus software
Can't say for sure as it's a "black box" to which you don't
get real shell access. The command line only grants access to
a tool from which the m
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 10:07, Cris Fuhrman wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:43:32 -0500 (EST), Tom Gwilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The response was along the lines of "not available at this time, and it
> > would cost you tens of thousands of dollars to implement with existing
> > hardware, etc"
org
Subject: Re: Barracuda's Spam firewall
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:43:32 -0500 (EST), Tom Gwilt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The response was along the lines of "not available at this time, and
> it would cost you tens of thousands of dollars to implement with
> existing hardware,
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:43:32 -0500 (EST), Tom Gwilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The response was along the lines of "not available at this time, and it
> would cost you tens of thousands of dollars to implement with existing
> hardware, etc".
>
> OK - so I found a Dell 1600SC, put FreeBSD, Postfi
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Gray, Richard wrote:
If any of you fine people has any experience with this (tested it, use it, know
someone else who uses it) I'd really appreciate any feedback you could give me
on its pros/cons.
Thanks.
Richard
I checked into it several months ago.
Seemed nifty, so I call
Hi Tim B,
> They bounce EVERYTHING causing a ton of backscatter. ÂThey seem to
> accept all mail, process it then bounce it back to the "sender" which is
> usually fake.
Yeah, that's sad but true for the default configuration. Since long I set mine
to "Reject" instead of bounce and completely fo
Gray, Richard wrote:
Anyone care to comment on how successful/effective this particular
product is? (http://www.barracudanetworks.com)
There is something of a major dispute going regarding whether this
represents better value for mney than other solutions (including our
own, self built service
> > Sorry to get off-topic-ish here,
> > But could you tell us what Barracuda uses for:
> > - MTA
> > - Anti spam software
> > - Anti virus software
>
> Can't say for sure as it's a "black box" to which you don't
> get real shell access. The command line only grants access to
> a tool from wh
Hi Niek,
> Sorry to get off-topic-ish here,
> But could you tell us what Barracuda uses for:
> - MTA
> - Anti spam software
> - Anti virus software
Can't say for sure as it's a "black box" to which you don't get real shell
access. The command line only grants access to a tool from which the most
On 2/28/2005 8:13 AM +0100, Michael Stauber wrote:
Hi Richard,
Anyone care to comment on how successful/effective this particular product
is? (http://www.barracudanetworks.com)
There is something of a major dispute going regarding whether this
represents better value for mney than other solutions
Hi Richard,
> Anyone care to comment on how successful/effective this particular product
> is? (http://www.barracudanetworks.com)
>
> There is something of a major dispute going regarding whether this
> represents better value for mney than other solutions (including our own,
> self built service)
]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 8:36 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Barracuda's Spam firewall
> Anyone care to comment on how successful/effective this
> particular product is? (http://www.barracudanetworks.com)
A few months ago, I was chatting with an IT contrac
> Anyone care to comment on how successful/effective this
> particular product is? (http://www.barracudanetworks.com)
A few months ago, I was chatting with an IT contractor guy in my city who
had installed the barracuda firewall for many large clients, including a
large hospital. I sent this guy a
Hello Richard,
Friday, February 25, 2005, 7:58:54 AM, you wrote:
GR> Anyone care to comment on how successful/effective this
GR> particular product is? (http://www.barracudanetworks.com)
I'm an end-user of an Exchange server based system that has a
Barracuda front-end, and also the email admin o
On Friday 25 February 2005 09:26 am, you wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:20:13AM -0800, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> > making a killing on the hardware depending on what they are using on the
> > software side. If it's a bunch of oss stuff on the inside then their
> > development costs are next to n
"Gray, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 02/25/2005 09:58:54 AM:
> Anyone care to comment on how successful/effective this particular
> product is? (http://www.barracudanetworks.com)
>
> There is something of a major dispute going regarding
whether this
> represents better value for mney
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:20:13AM -0800, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> making a killing on the hardware depending on what they are using on the
> software side. If it's a bunch of oss stuff on the inside then their
> development costs are next to nothing and they in essence are charging allot
> for a
On Friday 25 February 2005 07:58 am, Gray, Richard wrote:
> Anyone care to comment on how successful/effective this particular product
> is? (http://www.barracudanetworks.com)
>
> There is something of a major dispute going regarding whether this
> represents better value for mney than other soluti
Anyone care to comment on how successful/effective this
particular product is? (http://www.barracudanetworks.com)
There is something of a major dispute going regarding
whether this represents better value for mney than other solutions (including
our own, self built service)
If
any of you fi
22 matches
Mail list logo
