Please do keep threads on-list. I am not a personal tech support,
neither the only one who can answer your questions.
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 16:11 -0500, mdunlap wrote:
> Thanks for getting me on the right track you've been a big help so far.
> Okay so spamc was passing the message through detecti
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 21:06 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 13:10 -0500, mdunlap wrote:
> > Thanks Karsten, I am a bit new to this so I do apologize. Here is a link
> > to one of the offending emails, http://drop.io/xf2ict5/asset/spam
>
> That sample is about 980 kB large
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 13:10 -0500, mdunlap wrote:
> Thanks Karsten, I am a bit new to this so I do apologize. Here is a link
> to one of the offending emails, http://drop.io/xf2ict5/asset/spam
That sample is about 980 kB large.
This would solve the first mystery -- why SA "does not recognize it a
Thanks Karsten, I am a bit new to this so I do apologize. Here is a link
to one of the offending emails, http://drop.io/xf2ict5/asset/spam
When I try to have the Bayesian filter learn from spam in the terminal and
was to run "sa-learn --spam RANDOM_SPAM_MESSAGE" it would output as:
"Learned tokens
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 15:09 -0500, mdunlap wrote:
> I've had problems sa-learning some particular emails that have some ASCII
> escape characters, I've been getting this email that passes right through
> the filter Subject: (¯`·._..babes_in_blue^(TM).._.·´¯) sa-learn won't
> recognize it as an actu
