Re: BAYES_00 and FN

2008-02-23 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On 22.02.08 14:04, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > I see a lot of messages hitting BAYES_00 and reducing enough to make it > > a FN. After some learning, problem solved, but still an issue for new > > message types. Is there a way to protect from this sort of thing? Like a > > recipe not to add the

Re: BAYES_00 and FN

2008-02-23 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 22.02.08 14:04, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > I see a lot of messages hitting BAYES_00 and reducing enough to make it > a FN. After some learning, problem solved, but still an issue for new > message types. Is there a way to protect from this sort of thing? Like a > recipe not to add the bayes sco

BAYES_00 and FN

2008-02-22 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
I see a lot of messages hitting BAYES_00 and reducing enough to make it a FN. After some learning, problem solved, but still an issue for new message types. Is there a way to protect from this sort of thing? Like a recipe not to add the bayes score if the score is over 7 and BAYES_50 or lower? Woul