On Sun, July 12, 2009 21:04, Admin wrote:
> $ sa-learn --no-sync --spam --mbox ~/mail/Spam
ls -l ~/mail/Spam
ls -l /mail/Spam
> bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/user/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O:
> tie failed:
does the dir .spamassassin exists with the same user ?
have you set
Hi there,
Any clues how I can fix the following error?
sa-learn is failing
$ sa-learn --no-sync --spam --mbox ~/mail/Spam
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/user/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O:
tie failed:
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/user/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O:
tie failed
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Mike Fahey wrote:
Every 24 hours, the following message scrolls in the log
sa stop processing and I have to stop sa, remove bayes* and restart it.
18804736 bayes_toks.expire55880
10989568 bayes_toks.expire56051
19247104 bayes_toks.expire56167
18370560 bayes_toks.expire5
Every 24 hours, the following message scrolls in the log
sa stop processing and I have to stop sa, remove bayes* and restart it.
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/sabayes/bayes_* R/W: lock
failed: Interrupted system call
Contents of bayes directory.
6756 bayes.mutex
2474884
Andy Balaam wrote:
> [9398] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /etc/spamassassin/bayes_toks
> [9398] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
> /etc/spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Permission denied
> [9398] dbg: bayes: untie-ing DB file toks
> [9398] dbg: bayes: not
ntie-ing db_seen
[9398] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /etc/spamassassin/bayes_toks
[9398] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/etc/spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Permission denied
[9398] dbg: bayes: untie-ing DB file toks
[9398] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /etc/spamassassin/ba
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 02:59:40PM +, Andy Balaam wrote:
> Any ideas on this, anyone? Thanks, Andy
Run with -D, or -D bayes, and see what it says.
Your mail seems to indicate that you're running spamc/spamd, but tried debug
with spamassassin, which may tell you something, or it may not, since
Any ideas on this, anyone? Thanks, Andy
Andy Balaam wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I think I've got everything set up correctly for postfix + spamassassin
> spam filtering, but I'm not getting any BAYES_ tags in the emails I am
> receiving. I'd appreciate any help you c
Hi everyone,
I think I've got everything set up correctly for postfix + spamassassin
spam filtering, but I'm not getting any BAYES_ tags in the emails I am
receiving. I'd appreciate any help you can give me. Thanks in advance.
I'm running Ubuntu Dapper.
I'
* On 27/11/06 16:31 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
| On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:23:30AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
| > When spamd is being run WITHOUT -u johndoe, then presumably, it is
| > running as root, yes?
|
| The parent is, the children run as the user calling spamc.
|
| > So, who s
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:23:30AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> When spamd is being run WITHOUT -u johndoe, then presumably, it is
> running as root, yes?
The parent is, the children run as the user calling spamc.
> So, who should own the files in --siteconfigpath? Especially those that
>
I am trying to figure out something:
When spamd is being run WITHOUT -u johndoe, then presumably, it is
running as root, yes?
So, who should own the files in --siteconfigpath? Especially those that
require modification, like the bayes* and auto_whitelist files?
I am running a setup where spamc
Bowie Bailey BUC.com> writes:
>
>
> martin wrote:
> > Bowie Bailey BUC.com> writes:
> They trained on similar email, but not quite the same. There must
> have been something that caused them to go in different directions.
> Maybe you installed some extra rules on one of them. Regardless, t
sassin
> > > local.cf at both server, will it reduce/increase the BAYES_ value?
> >
> > The Bayes rules depend on exactly two things:
> >
> > 1) The training of the Bayes database
> > 2) The content of the email
> >
> > No other settings w
r, will it reduce/increase the BAYES_ value?
>
> The Bayes rules depend on exactly two things:
>
> 1) The training of the Bayes database
> 2) The content of the email
>
> No other settings will affect them.
>
> If you have a ham message that is getting a BAYES_99 rule
all rules seem the same, expected BAYES_50 vs BAYES_99. What will
> the causing for this value so high at backup server. Also, i had set
> internal_networks 192.168.2.0/24 at both spamassassin local.cf at
> both server, will it reduce/increase the BAYES_ value?
The Bayes rules depend on exac
set
internal_networks 192.168.2.0/24 at both spamassassin local.cf at
both server, will it reduce/increase the BAYES_ value?
Thank for helping
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Gottlieb writes:
>OK, I do see messages like:
>
>bayes: cannot open bayes databases
>/net/mail/etc/mail/spamassassin/site-wide/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists
>
>I moved to a site-wide database because most users aren&
OK, I do see messages like:
bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/net/mail/etc/mail/spamassassin/site-wide/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists
I moved to a site-wide database because most users aren't going to
bother with training, so I figured this way all users can benefit from
the tra
On 2005-12-14 at 10:21, Jim Gottlieb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't see any logs kept by spamassassin.
OK, I found them in syslog.
So far I don't see any bayes-related errors.
On 2005-12-14 at 09:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > access to it, so I could see that bayes access might often time out
> > while waiting for some other's lock to expire?
>
> Depends on traffic... there should be some bayes errors in your logs if there
> are timeout issues.
Jim Gottlieb wrote:
> I notice that in many of the spam messages that sneak through, the
> X-Spam-Status header does not have any BAYES_* score. Does this
> indicate a problem? Should all messages includes a BAYES score?
Not all, but certainly most.
> I am using a single bayes
I notice that in many of the spam messages that sneak through, the
X-Spam-Status header does not have any BAYES_* score. Does this
indicate a problem? Should all messages includes a BAYES score?
I am using a single bayes database for our whole network, mounted via
NFS. But it seems to lock it
tore/DBM.pm line 1772.
...
--- Delimiter END -
Procmail is also complaining as shown below--which may not be surprising
given the issue above?
-- Delimiter BEGIN
Cannot open bayes databases /home/mj/.spamassassin/bayes_
At 02:22 PM 11/23/2004, Adam Beatham wrote:
Is
there a possibility of some disconnect between mimedefang and SA that
would prevent it from stamping a bayes_* score?
Highly unlikely, unless it wasn't stamping any rules at all. Really from
the perspective of MD, BAYES_20 is no different fro
First off, thank you both (Matt and Jim) for your help. So I just ran a
couple messages that had made it into my inbox with no bayes_* tags
through spamassassin -D. Both of them report the same standard rule
matches as they did originally, but through -D, both of them have a
bayes_* match as
At 02:00 PM 11/23/2004, Adam Beatham wrote:
This may or may not be a SA problem, but I'm stumped. I don't know when
it exactly it happened, but recently I've noticed more and more spam
trickling into my inbox. After looking, it appears that not every
message gets scored with a bay
Adam Beatham wrote:
Howdy,
This may or may not be a SA problem, but I'm stumped. I don't know when
it exactly it happened, but recently I've noticed more and more spam
trickling into my inbox. After looking, it appears that not every
message gets scored with a bayes_* tag.. some
Howdy,
This may or may not be a SA problem, but I'm stumped. I don't know when
it exactly it happened, but recently I've noticed more and more spam
trickling into my inbox. After looking, it appears that not every
message gets scored with a bayes_* tag.. some do, some don'
ther way -ya?
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x3cb7d078)
inhibited further callbacks
debug: bayes: 7110 tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/amavisd/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
Cannot open bayes databases /var/amavisd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O:
tie failed: Inappropriate file type or forma
es /var/amavisd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie
failed: Inappropriate file type or format
debug: bayes: 7110 untie-ing DB file toks
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: bayes: 7110 tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/amavisd/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
Cannot open bayes databases /var/amavisd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R
SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: auto_learn 1
debug: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: dcc_add_header 1
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x3cb7d078)
inhibited further callbacks
debug: bayes: 7110 tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/amavisd/.spamassas
At 12:25 AM 10/13/2004 -0700, Chris Weiss wrote:
I've tried completely deleting and re-creating the bayes databases (using
sa-learn clear followed by sa-learn on my various mailboxes), but am still
getting the errors. I also made sure I'd installed DB_file (I'd read
somewhere it was needed). Any
went well, except now I'm getting the following error:
Cannot open bayes databases /var/amavisd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie
failed: Inappropriate file type or format
I've tried completely deleting and re-creating the bayes databases
(using sa-learn clear followed by sa-learn on my va
34 matches
Mail list logo
