Hi Mouss, thanks for your answer.
In my installation, I've got a firewall with antispam features.
The target I want to achieve is to bypass SA check when a message has been
already tagged as spam by the firewall.
I'll try posting the question on the postfix-users list.
Bye,
-Pietro.
2009/7/25 mo
>
> # apt-get install postfix-pcre
>
>
> Please move this to the postfix-users list. This is my last response here.
>
>
There is no need joining postfix-users, as the solutions is there already
for me. Thank You :)
On Sun, July 26, 2009 00:06, mouss wrote:
> Please move this to the postfix-users list. This is my last response here.
truly a lie :)
--
xpoint
Jari Fredriksson a écrit :
>> snip
did you see this:
>>>
>> This is really a postfix question. Follow up on the
>> postfix-users list if needed.
did you see that?
>>
>> [snip]
>
> Got the following error, when tried that. I'm using stock postfix on Debian
> Lenny w/ backports.
>
>
> postf
> Pietro a écrit :
>> In my installation, SA is called by Postfix. Any idea?
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>
> This is really a postfix question. Follow up on the
> postfix-users list if needed.
>
> you can skip filtering using header_checks. for example
> /^X-Spam-Status: Yes/ FILTER smtp:[127.0.0.
Pietro a écrit :
> In my installation, SA is called by Postfix. Any idea? Thanks in advance.
>
This is really a postfix question. Follow up on the postfix-users list
if needed.
you can skip filtering using header_checks. for example
/^X-Spam-Status: Yes/ FILTER smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025
assuming
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 04:14 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> If you postfix calls SpamAssasin directly as configured
> in /etc/postfix/master.cf I have no ideas.
>
I think you can run a script that calls spamc rather than spamc itself.
The script could use grep or (better) awk[1] to search for sp
> 2009/7/22 Jari Fredriksson
>
>> Hi all,
>> I've got a firewall with antispam functionalities which
>> already adds X headers.
>> I need to know if I can bypass SpamAssassin checks when
>> it finds specific headers.
>
> It depends on how you call SpamAssassin. If from procmail
> or maildrop
In my installation, SA is called by Postfix. Any idea? Thanks in advance.
-Pietro.
2009/7/22 Jari Fredriksson
> > Hi all,
> > I've got a firewall with antispam functionalities which
> > already adds X headers.
> > I need to know if I can bypass SpamAssassin checks when
> > it finds specific
> Hi all,
> I've got a firewall with antispam functionalities which
> already adds X headers.
> I need to know if I can bypass SpamAssassin checks when
> it finds specific headers.
>
>
It depends on how you call SpamAssassin. If from procmail or maildrop, that is
easy to arrange.
Hi all,
I've got a firewall with antispam functionalities which already adds X
headers.
I need to know if I can bypass SpamAssassin checks when it finds specific
headers.
Thanks in advance.
-Pietro.
11 matches
Mail list logo