Re: Another tracking cookie trick

2005-06-24 Thread jdow
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I don't see the advantage of this. How does a *message header* help in > > tracking? Or does it correspond with a web bug? > > List washing. When they actually get a complaint about spam, they can > remove the address from the list, even if the report

Re: Another tracking cookie trick

2005-06-24 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Loren Wilton writes: > > I don't see the advantage of this. How does a *message header* help in > > tracking? Or does it correspond with a web bug? > > List washing. When they actually get a complaint about spam, they can > remove the address from t

Re: Another tracking cookie trick

2005-06-24 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Aaaah, clever, thank you, both! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org

Re: Another tracking cookie trick

2005-06-24 Thread Loren Wilton
> I don't see the advantage of this. How does a *message header* help in > tracking? Or does it correspond with a web bug? List washing. When they actually get a complaint about spam, they can remove the address from the list, even if the report is something like Spamcop that attempts to remove a

Re: Another tracking cookie trick

2005-06-24 Thread jdow
> Jdow wrote on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:58:22 -0700: > > > X-Message-ID: > > 106.100.111.119.64.101.97.114.116.104.108.105.110.107.46.110.101.116 > > > > Which is merely my email address encoded stupidly. > > I don't see the advantage of this. How does a *message header* help in > tracking? Or d

Re: Another tracking cookie trick

2005-06-24 Thread jdow
From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Jdow wrote on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:58:22 -0700: > > > X-Message-ID: > > 106.100.111.119.64.101.97.114.116.104.108.105.110.107.46.110.101.116 > > > > Which is merely my email address encoded stupidly. > > I don't see the advantage of this. How does a

Re: Another tracking cookie trick

2005-06-24 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jdow wrote on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:58:22 -0700: > X-Message-ID: > 106.100.111.119.64.101.97.114.116.104.108.105.110.107.46.110.101.116 > > Which is merely my email address encoded stupidly. I don't see the advantage of this. How does a *message header* help in tracking? Or does it correspond

Re: Another tracking cookie trick

2005-06-23 Thread jdow
I am not doing it. Somebody else tacked that on as a tracking cookie on an email sent to me. I am no filtering on the trick. {^_-} - Original Message - From: "Bruno S. Delbono" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Message-ID: > 106.100.111.119.64.101.97.114.116.104.108.105.110.107.46.110.101.116 >

RE: Another tracking cookie trick

2005-06-23 Thread Bruno S. Delbono
> X-Message-ID: > 106.100.111.119.64.101.97.114.116.104.108.105.110.107.46.110.101.116 > > > Which is merely my email address encoded stupidly. > > {^_-} And how are you doing this? On the client or the server side? Is this a static X-* header or a dynamic per email header? We're using X-Bright

Another tracking cookie trick

2005-06-23 Thread jdow
X-Message-ID: 106.100.111.119.64.101.97.114.116.104.108.105.110.107.46.110.101.116 Which is merely my email address encoded stupidly. {^_-}