> > RW wrote:
> > > The much more common scenario is that the first spam hits BAYES_50
> > > and subsequent BAYES_99 hits are countered by a negative AWL score.
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:09:04 -0400
> Matt Kettler wrote:
> > Technically, this only counters half the score. It also gets "paid
> > b
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:09:04 -0400
Matt Kettler wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > The much more common scenario is that the first spam hits BAYES_50
> > and subsequent BAYES_99 hits are countered by a negative AWL score.
> >
> Technically, this only counters half the score. It also gets "paid
> back" l
RW wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:33:51 +0200
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:56:35 -0400
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Please be aware the AWL is NOT whitelist, or a blacklist, and
> the scores don't really quite work the way they look. The
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:33:51 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:56:35 -0400
> > > Matt Kettler wrote:
> > > > Please be aware the AWL is NOT whitelist, or a blacklist, and
> > > > the scores don't really quite work the way they look. The AWL is
> > > > essentially a
> > On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:56:35 -0400
> > Matt Kettler wrote:
> > > Please be aware the AWL is NOT whitelist, or a blacklist, and the
> > > scores don't really quite work the way they look. The AWL is
> > > essentially an averager, and as such, it's sometimes going to assign
> > > negative scores
On Sat, July 4, 2009 20:55, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> To prevent manualy learning of the MEDS spams I have set my MEDS-Score
> to 8.00 and do not get any spams except "caNN" and "genNN".
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL
see the awl factor setting, default its 0.5, so if you dont like t
On Sat, July 4, 2009 20:50, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Goog evening Jari,
>
> Am 2009-07-04 13:46:45, schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/SqlReadmeAwl
>
> Thankyou for the link, but if I understand it right, spamassassin is
> then using ONE Datab
On Sat, July 4, 2009 10:20, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> ...because the Spamer From: is in the auto_whitelist.
aRG :/
from and SENDER IP is in the awl table, where is the problem ?
if you match the sender ip very well (/16 fuzzy) then i see the problem
and btw awl is NOT a whitelist !
--
xpoin
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 20:55:12 +0200
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2009-07-04 13:12:07, schrieb RW:
> > So what happens if you don't remove it, what error do you get when
> > you run sa-learn?#
>
> If I do not remove it beforre "sa-learn --spam", I get an negative
> AWL score.
>
> If I remove it,
> Goog evening Jari,
>
> Am 2009-07-04 13:46:45, schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/SqlReadmeAwl
>
> Thankyou for the link, but if I understand it right, spamassassin is
> then using ONE Database/Table for ALL users... This mean, the Database
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 14:09:29 +0100
RW wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:56:35 -0400
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> > Please be aware the AWL is NOT whitelist, or a blacklist, and the
> > scores don't really quite work the way they look. The AWL is
> > essentially an averager, and as such, it's sometime
In an older episode (Saturday, 4. July 2009), Michelle Konzack wrote:
> If I do not remove it beforre "sa-learn --spam", I get an negative
> AWL score.
>
> If I remove it, and run "sa-learn --spam" again, AWL is not
> mentiioned.
In my understanding, the fact that the "From:" address is in the
Am 2009-07-04 13:12:07, schrieb RW:
> So what happens if you don't remove it, what error do you get when you
> run sa-learn?#
If I do not remove it beforre "sa-learn --spam", I get an negative AWL
score.
If I remove it, and run "sa-learn --spam" again, AWL is not mentiioned.
To prevent manual
Goog evening Jari,
Am 2009-07-04 13:46:45, schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/SqlReadmeAwl
Thankyou for the link, but if I understand it right, spamassassin is
then using ONE Database/Table for ALL users... This mean, the Database
will grow m
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:56:35 -0400
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Please be aware the AWL is NOT whitelist, or a blacklist, and the
> scores don't really quite work the way they look. The AWL is
> essentially an averager, and as such, it's sometimes going to assign
> negative scores to spam sometimes.
An
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while I get currently several 1000 shop/meds/pill/gen spams a day and
> some are going throug my filters, I have to move them to my spamfolder
> manualy and feed them to "sa-learn --spam" but this does not work...
>
> ...because the Spamer From: is in the a
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while I get currently several 1000 shop/meds/pill/gen spams a day and
> some are going throug my filters, I have to move them to my spamfolder
> manualy and feed them to "sa-learn --spam" but this does not work...
>
> ...because the Spamer From: is in the a
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:20:06 +0200
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while I get currently several 1000 shop/meds/pill/gen spams a day
> and some are going throug my filters, I have to move them to my
> spamfolder manualy and feed them to "sa-learn --spam" but this does
> not work...
>
> .
> Am 2009-07-04 11:53:27, schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
>> Do You have SQL based AWL? If not, it might be worth a consideration,
>> given your amounts of email.
>
> AWL in SQL?
>
> Yes, I have a PostgreSQL database available (mean, each user has one),
> but how can I setup spamassassin to use it?
>
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 11:53:27AM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > while I get currently several 1000 shop/meds/pill/gen spams a day and
> > some are going throug my filters, I have to move them to my spamfolder
> > manualy and feed them to "sa-learn --spam" but this does not
Am 2009-07-04 11:53:27, schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
> Do You have SQL based AWL? If not, it might be worth a consideration,
> given your amounts of email.
AWL in SQL?
Yes, I have a PostgreSQL database available (mean, each user has one),
but how can I setup spamassassin to use it?
> With SQL
>
> Hello,
>
> while I get currently several 1000 shop/meds/pill/gen spams a day and
> some are going throug my filters, I have to move them to my spamfolder
> manualy and feed them to "sa-learn --spam" but this does not work...
>
> ...because the Spamer From: is in the auto_whitelist.
>
> For m
Hello,
while I get currently several 1000 shop/meds/pill/gen spams a day and
some are going throug my filters, I have to move them to my spamfolder
manualy and feed them to "sa-learn --spam" but this does not work...
...because the Spamer From: is in the auto_whitelist.
For me, this seems t
23 matches
Mail list logo
