Sn!per wrote:
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sn!per wrote:
Hi all,
Am using SA version 3.2.4 . So far working great.
I am comparing the headers on two of my mails. The first mail is NOT a
spam, and X-Spam-Status is like so:
No, score=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RC
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sn!per wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Am using SA version 3.2.4 . So far working great.
> >
> > I am comparing the headers on two of my mails. The first mail is NOT a
> spam, and X-Spam-Status is like so:
> >
> > No, score=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HE
Sn!per wrote:
Hi all,
Am using SA version 3.2.4 . So far working great.
I am comparing the headers on two of my mails. The first mail is NOT a spam,
and X-Spam-Status is like so:
No, score=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no
version=3.2.4
The second email is a s
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:23:09AM +0800, Sn!per wrote:
> Question: Why is it that on the header of the ham, autolearn=no ?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
There was a young lady named Bright
Who could travel much faster than light.
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 10:23 +0800, Sn!per wrote:
> I am comparing the headers on two of my mails. The first mail is NOT a
> spam, and X-Spam-Status is like so:
>
> No, score=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no
> version=3.2.4
^^^
> The second email is a s
Hi all,
Am using SA version 3.2.4 . So far working great.
I am comparing the headers on two of my mails. The first mail is NOT a spam,
and X-Spam-Status is like so:
No, score=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no
version=3.2.4
The second email is a spam, and its X-S
