On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Kelson wrote:
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:58:42 -0800
> From: Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Adjusting SA scores in 50_scores.cf...
>
> John D. Hardin wrote:
> >score URIBL_SBL 5
> >
>
John D. Hardin wrote:
score URIBL_SBL 5
Discussion of the advisability of a single poison-pill rule is for
another day, though if you *do* want to spamcan everything that hits
SBL you'd be better served doing it at the MTA layer as a regular
DNSBL test.
Also, isn't SBL folded into Zen th
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Ken Morley wrote:
> I'm running SpamAssassin 3.2.3 and have been advised to increase
> the score for URIBL_SBL to 5.0. I see where it is defined in
> 50_scores.cf, but I don't completely understand the format.
Don't change the distribution files. Alter scores in a local.cf f
I'm running SpamAssassin 3.2.3 and have been advised to increase the
score for URIBL_SBL to 5.0. I see where it is defined in 50_scores.cf,
but I don't completely understand the format.
Mine shows:
score URIBL_SBL 0 2.468 0 1.499 # n=0 n=2
Is the last score (1.499) the one I should increase? We
