Re: Addendum -- New spamassassin significant install problems

2007-08-21 Thread dougp23
;>> user >>> it will be running as. >>> >> I just created the spamfilter userid and group. I did not install pyzor >> or razor yet. What are they and why do I want to install them? >> >> I ran the spamassassin -D --lint >> >> I had a bit of a problem adding the -u spamfilter, so I asked on the >> Centos list where I was suppose to do this and was told it goes in >> /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin. That worked but I am still getting the >> errors. Even after a system reboot. >> >> Oh and nothing in the /home/spamfilter/.spamassassin >> >> 2264 root 15:48 /usr/bin/spamd -u spamfilter -d -c -m5 -H -r >> /var/run/spamd.pid >> 2301 spamfilter 15:48 spamd child >> 2302 spamfilter 15:48 spamd child >> >> Aug 17 16:00:31 z9m9z sendmail[3913]: l7HK0VeM003913: >> from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=6708, >> class=0, nrcpts=1, >> msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] >> Aug 17 16:00:31 z9m9z spamd[2301]: spamd: connection from >> localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at port 36972 >> Aug 17 16:00:31 z9m9z spamd[2301]: spamd: creating default_prefs: >> /root/.spamassassin/user_prefs >> Aug 17 16:00:31 z9m9z spamd[2301]: mkdir /root/.spamassassin: Permission >> denied at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1536 >> Aug 17 16:00:31 z9m9z spamd[2301]: config: cannot write to >> /root/.spamassassin/user_prefs: Permission denied >> Aug 17 16:00:31 z9m9z spamd[2301]: spamd: failed to create readable >> default_prefs: /root/.spamassassin/user_prefs >> Aug 17 16:00:31 z9m9z spamd[2301]: mkdir /root/.spamassassin: Permission >> denied at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1536 >> Aug 17 16:00:31 z9m9z spamd[2301]: spamd: processing message >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for root:502 >> Aug 17 16:00:33 z9m9z spamd[2301]: mkdir /root/.spamassassin: Permission >> denied at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1536 >> Aug 17 16:00:33 z9m9z spamd[2301]: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp >> lockfile >> /root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.z9m9z.htt-consult.com.2301 for >> /root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock: Permission denied >> Aug 17 16:00:33 z9m9z spamd[2301]: auto-whitelist: open of >> auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp >> lockfile >> /root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.z9m9z.htt-consult.com.2301 for >> /root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock: Permission denied >> Aug 17 16:00:33 z9m9z spamd[2301]: spamd: identified spam (8.5/5.0) for >> root:502 in 2.6 seconds, 7247 bytes. >> >> > > Spamd is still looking at /root/ as it's home dir. Maybe CentOs compiled > SpamAssassin differently? Not sure at this point :( > > James > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AddendumNew-spamassassin-significant-install-problems-tf4286992.html#a12253643 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Addendum -- New spamassassin significant install problems

2007-08-20 Thread James Lay
On 8/17/07 2:13 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well maybe progress but things are still wrong. > > James Lay wrote: >> >> On 8/17/07 11:53 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> More questions... >>> >>> James Lay wrote: >>> On 8/17/07

Re: Addendum -- New spamassassin significant install problems

2007-08-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Well maybe progress but things are still wrong. James Lay wrote: On 8/17/07 11:53 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: More questions... James Lay wrote: On 8/17/07 11:24 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks for the quick reply. James La

Re: Addendum -- New spamassassin significant install problems

2007-08-17 Thread James Lay
On 8/17/07 11:53 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > More questions... > > James Lay wrote: >> >> On 8/17/07 11:24 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> thanks for the quick reply. >>> >>> James Lay wrote: >>> On 8/17/07 10:58 AM, "Robert M

Re: Addendum -- New spamassassin significant install problems

2007-08-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
More questions... James Lay wrote: On 8/17/07 11:24 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks for the quick reply. James Lay wrote: On 8/17/07 10:58 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I left off below that I am using spam-milter 0.3.1-1 ===

Re: Addendum -- New spamassassin significant install problems

2007-08-17 Thread James Lay
On 8/17/07 11:24 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks for the quick reply. > > James Lay wrote: >> >> On 8/17/07 10:58 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> I left off below that I am using >>> spam-milter 0.3.1-1 >>> >>> ==

Re: Addendum -- New spamassassin significant install problems

2007-08-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
thanks for the quick reply. James Lay wrote: On 8/17/07 10:58 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I left off below that I am using spam-milter 0.3.1-1 === I am new to this. I have been running my mail server i

Re: Addendum -- New spamassassin significant install problems

2007-08-17 Thread James Lay
On 8/17/07 10:58 AM, "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I left off below that I am using > spam-milter 0.3.1-1 > > === > > I am new to this. I have been running my mail server in various flavors > for 10+ years. Alw

Addendum -- New spamassassin significant install problems

2007-08-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I left off below that I am using spam-milter 0.3.1-1 === I am new to this. I have been running my mail server in various flavors for 10+ years. Always trying to do better PLATFORM: Centos 5.0 1Ghz processor 512Mb memory