On 06.11.08 17:00, Joe Dragotta wrote:
> With the forwarding to SA active in both the system and user level
> procmailrc files, I was noting some odd behavior. The system level
> filtering was correctly tagging about 90% of the spam as spam and
> sending it to /dev/null/, and therefore was not
At 15:00 06-11-2008, Joe Dragotta wrote:
Not being very experienced in SA administration, I didn't know if SA
would process the same email twice, or if it kept track of message
IDs and only processed them once. Thusly, I needed to know whether
or not my originally described scenario would send
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Joe Dragotta wrote:
However some email was making it through for processing by the user
level procmailrc file, being again forwarded to SA, and then SA was
rewriting the subject to ID it as spam (the user_prefs file was not set
to send spam to /dev/null). Thusly, I was rece
SM wrote:
At 07:22 06-11-2008, Joe Dragotta wrote:
I would presume that if the global procmailrc file, in /etc/,
forwards mail to Spamassassin, and the users have individual
.procmailrc files, in their home directories, which also forward mail
to Spamassassin, any mail destined for such a user
At 07:22 06-11-2008, Joe Dragotta wrote:
I would presume that if the global procmailrc file, in /etc/,
forwards mail to Spamassassin, and the users have individual
.procmailrc files, in their home directories, which also forward
mail to Spamassassin, any mail destined for such a user would be
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Joe Dragotta wrote:
Greetings, My apologies re: HTML encoding. I've set Thunderbird to send
this message plain-text-only; hopefully that will work.
Top posting is also discouraged.
I don't wish to become involved in a long debate, and get off topic, but
how are methods o
Greetings, My apologies re: HTML encoding. I've set Thunderbird to send
this message plain-text-only; hopefully that will work.
I don't wish to become involved in a long debate, and get off topic, but
how are methods of invoking SA are not SA business? To me that seems
like an integral part
On 06.11.08 09:22, Joe Dragotta wrote:
>Greetings,
Hello,
please post plaintext messages to the list.
>Being fairly new to Spamassassin administration, I have a fairly basic
>question about host resource usage.
>
>I would presume that if the global procmailrc file, in /etc/, for
Greetings,
Being fairly new to Spamassassin administration, I have a fairly basic
question about host resource usage.
I would presume that if the global procmailrc file, in /etc/, forwards
mail to Spamassassin, and the users have individual .procmailrc files,
in their home directories, which
