>> spamassassin -r and spamassassin -k do other things - report to network
>> services like razor/pyzor/dcc and SpamCop.
On 22.09.09 22:11, João Eiras wrote:
> Hum, then how do the default spam filters that come with a clean spam
> assassin installation know what's spam and what's not ? Is there s
spamassassin -r and spamassassin -k do other things - report to network
services like razor/pyzor/dcc and SpamCop.
Hum, then how do the default spam filters that come with a clean spam assassin
installation know what's spam and what's not ?
Is there service we can report spam to ?
Hello,
please configure your mailer to wrap lines below 80 characters per line.
72 to 75 is usually OK.
Thank you.
>>> On 19.09.09 22:45, João Eiras wrote:
I still haven't got the answer to my last question, so here it goes
again: Can I report a full mbs file with many mails in one go
On tir 22 sep 2009 03:05:30 CEST, João Eiras wrote
Goodbye.
dont want to be here anymore ?
--
xpoint
On 19.09.09 22:45, João Eiras wrote:
I still haven't got the answer to my last question, so here it goes again:
Can I report a full mbs file with many mails in one go ? Or should I split each
mail on it's own file ?
sa-learn can accept mail in mbox format. It's even in its manual page.
Is th
On , Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On , Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:08 PM, João Eiras wrote:
Should the file message.txt in the example contain the full -mail with
headers, attachments and everything ?
Yes. It should be the original and complete message.
Does the
> On , Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:08 PM, João Eiras wrote:
>>> Should the file message.txt in the example contain the full -mail with
>>> headers, attachments and everything ?
>>
>> Yes. It should be the original and complete message.
>>
>>> Does the reporting tool rem
On , Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:08 PM, João Eiras wrote:
Should the file message.txt in the example contain the full -mail with
headers, attachments and everything ?
Yes. It should be the original and complete message.
Does the reporting tool remove all information
On , Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:08 PM, João Eiras wrote:
Should the file message.txt in the example contain the full -mail with
headers, attachments and everything ?
Yes. It should be the original and complete message.
Does the reporting tool remove all information
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:08 PM, João Eiras wrote:
> Should the file message.txt in the example contain the full -mail with
> headers, attachments and everything ?
Yes. It should be the original and complete message.
> Does the reporting tool remove all information about the receiver for
> priv
Hi everyone.
I'm getting a bunch of spam through on my work account.
After reading this http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ReportingSpam a few
doubts remain.
Should the file message.txt in the example contain the full -mail with headers,
attachments and everything ?
Does the reporting tool re
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> >
> > Oh, really?
> >
> > So why I get a DCC_CHECK only after manually reporting (with
> spamassassin
> > -r) a spam?
> >
> I have no idea.
>
> Are you running a check *immediately* befor
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>
> Oh, really?
>
> So why I get a DCC_CHECK only after manually reporting (with spamassassin
> -r) a spam?
>
I have no idea.
Are you running a check *immediately* before calling spammassassin -r?
If not, the difference is probably due to passage of time more than
any
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> > Dears,
> >
> > what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a
> given
> > threshold (say, 10-12)?
> >
> > Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or S
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> Dears,
>
> what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a given
> threshold (say, 10-12)?
>
> Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or SC?
>
Razor, definitely. The Razor FAQ explicitly prohibits this. They want
hand verified mail
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: venerdì 18 maggio 2007 18.19
> A: 'Spamassassin'
> Oggetto: Re: Question about reporting
>
> Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> > what's wrong with automatically SA-report mess
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a given
threshold (say, 10-12)?
Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or SC?
Razor discourages automatic reporting because they're concerned about
false positives. They prefer verifi
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: venerdì 18 maggio 2007 16.34
> A: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Oggetto: Re: R: Question about reporting
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 15:29, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>
> >> 1)
On Fri, May 18, 2007 15:29, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>> 1) Your server can be used in a DoS against the distributed services
>>
>
> You mean, by sending valid content on high-scoring mails? Mmmh. Yes, this
> may create trouble to DCC, Pyzor and Razor. Not to SC, since they are
> mostly interest
uted services
I did browse my quarantine to have a check to FPs. Didn't find anything at
score 8... I don't think this would really be an issue, unless "something
goes wrong" and my systems start quarantining good mails, which is a
respectful case.
Ok. I think I could always r
On Fri, May 18, 2007 14:50, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a given
> threshold (say, 10-12)?
>
> Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or SC?
>
>
> I often see that high-scoring messages are reported as spam by some o
Dears,
what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a given
threshold (say, 10-12)?
Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or SC?
I often see that high-scoring messages are reported as spam by some of the
above-mentioned engine, but seldom by all of them.
Pl
22 matches
Mail list logo
