On 5/4/2005 1:11 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Got any better suggestions for a name?
STS = Sender Trending Score
It is an independent score that is applied separately based on the
sender's historical trend.
Consonants make better acronyms.
And it's accurate!
--
Eric A. Hall
Matt Kettler wrote:
Kelson wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Or were you under the misconception based on the name AWL that it is
only a whitelist?
The AWL isn't really a whitelist, it's a score averager. It has effect
of both an automatic whitelist and an automatic blacklist.
http://wiki.apache.
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 05:00 PM 5/4/2005, jdow wrote:
Accurate or not AWBL for Automatic White/Black List might be obscure
enough to inspire a minimal level of reading.
Along those lines, we could name it RTFM :)
The Real-Time "From:" Monitor?
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications
At 05:00 PM 5/4/2005, jdow wrote:
Accurate or not AWBL for Automatic White/Black List might be obscure
enough to inspire a minimal level of reading.
Along those lines, we could name it RTFM :)
On 5/4/05, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's great.. I was trying to think up a good scenario for that
> acronym, but couldn't.
Obviously it's the
Automated Spam Sorting Average Scoring System Involving Ninjas
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kelson wrote:
>
> > Matt Kettler wrote:
> >
> >> Or were you under the misconception based on the name AWL that it is
> >> only a whitelist?
> >>
> >> The AWL isn't really a whitelist, it's a score averager. It has effect
> >> of both an automatic whitel
Chris Santerre wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 4:16 PM
>>To: Andy Jezierski
>>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: AWL whaaat
>>
>>
>>Andy Jezi
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 4:16 PM
>To: Andy Jezierski
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: AWL whaaat
>
>
>Andy Jezierski wrote:
>
>>
>> I like it! And since the
Andy Jezierski wrote:
>
> I like it! And since the scores can shift over time, you'd probably
> want people to check them every now and then so you could tell them to
>
> Keep Intercepting Suspected Spam Monitor Your Average Scoring System
>
> Sorry, couldn't resist.
>
>
> Andy (Hangs his hea
Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 05/04/2005 02:20:01 PM:
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:11 PM
> >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: AWL wha
I'd have to turd... er third it!
-Doc
Gary W. Smith wrote:
I second.
HSA (Historical Score Averager) might be reasonably accurate,
but unless
you think about the math, it's purpose isn't clear. (And in my
experience, most people don't enjoy thinking about math. )
Got any better suggestions for a n
I second.
> >HSA (Historical Score Averager) might be reasonably accurate,
> >but unless
> >you think about the math, it's purpose isn't clear. (And in my
> >experience, most people don't enjoy thinking about math. )
> >
> >Got any better suggestions for a name?
>
> Average Scoring System or ASS
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:11 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: AWL whaaat
>
>
>Kelson wrote:
>
>> Matt Kettler wrote:
>>
>>> Or were you under th
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kelson wrote:
>
> > Matt Kettler wrote:
> >
> >> Or were you under the misconception based on the name AWL that it is
> >> only a whitelist?
> >>
> >> The AWL isn't really a whitelist, it's a score averager. It has effect
> >
Kelson wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> HSA (Historical Score Averager) might be reasonably accurate, but unless
>> you think about the math, it's purpose isn't clear. (And in my
>> experience, most people don't enjoy thinking about math. )
>
>
> I don't know what it says about my current state o
Matt Kettler wrote:
HSA (Historical Score Averager) might be reasonably accurate, but unless
you think about the math, it's purpose isn't clear. (And in my
experience, most people don't enjoy thinking about math. )
I don't know what it says about my current state of mind, but I misread
that as His
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler wrote:
|
| HSA (Historical Score Averager) might be reasonably accurate, but unless
| you think about the math, it's purpose isn't clear. (And in my
| experience, most people don't enjoy thinking about math. )
|
| Got any better suggestions
Kelson wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> Or were you under the misconception based on the name AWL that it is
>> only a whitelist?
>>
>> The AWL isn't really a whitelist, it's a score averager. It has effect
>> of both an automatic whitelist and an automatic blacklist.
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org
Matt Kettler wrote:
Or were you under the misconception based on the name AWL that it is
only a whitelist?
The AWL isn't really a whitelist, it's a score averager. It has effect
of both an automatic whitelist and an automatic blacklist.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist
I've said it
CTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 3:58 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: AWL whaaat
Can anyone explain this to me, because I don't under stand how 21 points
gets added to something in the AWL
pts rule name
Robert Swan wrote:
> Can anyone explain this to me, because I don’t under stand how 21
> points gets added to something in the AWL….
>
>
Why not? All you'd need is for the sender to have a past-average score
of 43.7
Or were you under the misconception based on the name AWL that it is
only a white
Can anyone explain this to me, because I don’t under
stand how 21 points gets added to something in the AWL….
pts rule name description
--
--
1.1 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real
22 matches
Mail list logo
