Re: AWL on per-user basis

2016-01-18 Thread Борис Кукушкин
Good day! You were completely right: after I added '-u debian-spamd' (this user was automatically created at the time of package installation) to the spamd start string in the /etc/default/spamassassin AWL started working right as expected. The database is now filled almost as expected: *

Re: AWL on per-user basis

2016-01-16 Thread RW
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:07:36 +0300 ? wrote: > No, spamd is running as user "root", so I don't have the "-u" key > anywhere in the smapd configs. I'm sorry for not making this clear > enough. > > What I meant to say is that when I send or receive a message through > my Exim (on the r

Re: AWL on per-user basis

2016-01-16 Thread Борис Кукушкин
Good day! Thanks for your reply. No, spamd is running as user "root", so I don't have the "-u" key anywhere in the smapd configs. I'm sorry for not making this clear enough. What I meant to say is that when I send or receive a message through my Exim (on the remote host) it passes the message to

Re: AWL on per-user basis

2016-01-14 Thread RW
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:21:44 +0300 ? wrote: > I'm using Spamassassin 3.4.0 on Debian Jessie and trying to set up AWL > stored in SQL on a per-user basis. My setup is as follows: > > 1) Spamassassin is run as 'spamd' on behalf of user root, the options > string is as follows: Is spam

AWL on per-user basis

2016-01-13 Thread Борис Кукушкин
I'm using Spamassassin 3.4.0 on Debian Jessie and trying to set up AWL stored in SQL on a per-user basis. My setup is as follows: 1) Spamassassin is run as 'spamd' on behalf of user root, the options string is as follows: OPTIONS="-D --create-prefs -x -q -Q --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir -i