I got it all wrong: I was assuming that AWL works by using a tuple consisting
of to/from (in the database: username/mail). Now thanks to your explanation I
got it that the username is in fact only used for user-bound AWL. This means
that I can simply use site-wide AWL.
TxRep sounds quite promis
ML mail skrev den 2014-06-26 16:42:
Ok so if I understand you correctly you are saying that it is possible
to use AWL as site-wide having just one part of the e-mail exchange
(the "To:" field) and this works fine/reliabily?
incorrect question, incorrect answer :=)
the username in awl is the un
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-06-26 16:34:
But the reason I'm posting is that many servers run sitewide AWL
without issue. Why do you feel it is useless?
multi recipient is handled better in amavisd-new, but its not very well
dokumented, if you always just get single recipient spams its not
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:42:50 -0700
ML mail wrote:
> Ok so if I understand you correctly you are saying that it is
> possible to use AWL as site-wide having just one part of the e-mail
> exchange (the "To:" field) and this works fine/reliabily?
To: isn't relevant, you either have site-wide or per
Ok so if I understand you correctly you are saying that it is possible to use
AWL as site-wide having just one part of the e-mail exchange (the "To:" field)
and this works fine/reliabily?
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:34 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/26/2014 10:31 AM, ML mail wrote:
I a
On 6/26/2014 10:31 AM, ML mail wrote:
I am using the auto-whitelist feature of SpamAssassin stored into a
PostgreSQL database. It works fine but I have got one issue: as I am
calling SA from amavisd-new, the username stored in the AWL SQL table
is always "amavis". Now this renders my AWL useles
Hi,
I am using the auto-whitelist feature of SpamAssassin stored into a PostgreSQL
database. It works fine but I have got one issue: as I am calling SA from
amavisd-new, the username stored in the AWL SQL table is always "amavis". Now
this renders my AWL useless as the username should actually
