At 04:55 PM 1/8/2005, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Thanks Matt,
So talking statistically, does it mean I have to train SA about 'ham' as many
as 'spam'? Right now, I train SA mostly on spams.
Ideally, yes.
( Personally, my understanding of statistics would say that real-world
ratios would be ideal, but D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2005 22:55 schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
> On Sunday 09 January 2005 04:47 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
[..]
> > Train spam as spam, train ham as ham. Let the statistics deal with the
> > overlap. By trying to avoid training "spamish" ham o
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: A very long spam
I try to train as much HAM as I can but I don't think it's possible to
train HAM/SPAM equally as 90% of incoming email is SPAM.
On Jan 8, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
At 04:34 AM 1/9/2005 +0700, you wrote:
Hi
ing sa-learn with SA 2.64 and 3.0.2
One thing is bugging me though. Is it safe to teach SA on a very
long spam
such as the stock report spam? Will it cause many False Positive?
Why would you think it would?
By trying to avoid training that message you're poisoning your bayes
database for false
On Sunday 09 January 2005 04:47 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 04:34 AM 1/9/2005 +0700, you wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >Greetings. I've just joined the list.
> >
> >I've been using sa-learn with SA 2.64 and 3.0.2
> >One thing is bugging me though. Is it safe to
At 04:34 AM 1/9/2005 +0700, you wrote:
Hi all,
Greetings. I've just joined the list.
I've been using sa-learn with SA 2.64 and 3.0.2
One thing is bugging me though. Is it safe to teach SA on a very long spam
such as the stock report spam? Will it cause many False Positive?
Why would yo
Hi all,
Greetings. I've just joined the list.
I've been using sa-learn with SA 2.64 and 3.0.2
One thing is bugging me though. Is it safe to teach SA on a very long spam
such as the stock report spam? Will it cause many False Positive?
Thanks
--
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Lin
