Vivek Khera wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > How about you just post the section that it FP'd on. Then we can
> > all enjoy the party.
>
> Not sure which section it is, but here's the whole shebang.
Oddly enough, it seems to match on the word "ALUMNI".
--
Bowie
On Dec 21, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
How about you just post the section that it FP'd on. Then we can
all enjoy the party.
Not sure which section it is, but here's the whole shebang.
--cut here--
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fp01.4rsg.net (fp01.4rsg.net [206.
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 2:11 PM
> To: SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: FP on SARE_MLB_Stock6 rule from 70_sare_stocks.cf
>
>
> I just got an email from my alma mater that triggered
&g
I just got an email from my alma mater that triggered SARE_MLB_Stock6
rule, so I went to see why... The comments in the file indicate it
matches 0 ham in all tested collections. Is there someone to whom I
can send this message (it is not private) to see if the rule can be
tightened?
Hi!
I'm not sure if this is the place to post rules_du_jour problem
but the http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour version 1.29
contain an invalid url for 70_sare_stocks.cf
CF_URLS[70]="${RULESEMPORIUM}/rules/70_sare_stocks.cf";
should be
CF_URLS[70]=&
I just committed a fix to the one which had lint errors.
#version: 01.00.36
--
-Doc
SA/SARE -- Ninja
3:24pm up 20 days, 18:58, 19 users, load average: 1.02, 0.79, 0.74
SARE HQ http://www.rulesemporium.com/
