Hi chris,
Am 2008-07-10 19:45:30, schrieb Chris:
> Anyone seen these lately? The spam consists of a multi-mb .pps between 3 and
> as of this occurance 6.8mb. I've got my procmail recipe for calling sa set to
> 3mb currently:
Since you are calling spamassassin from procmail, I would not even all
On Thursday 10 July 2008 9:05 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 07:45:30PM -0500, Chris wrote:
> > :0 fw : $ASSASSINLOCK
> >
> > * < 300
> >
> > | /usr/bin/spamc -f
> >
> > will it be worth it to adjust upwards? This not a mail server but just a
> > home system with one user,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 07:45:30PM -0500, Chris wrote:
> :0 fw : $ASSASSINLOCK
> * < 300
> | /usr/bin/spamc -f
>
> will it be worth it to adjust upwards? This not a mail server but just a home
> system with one user, me.
The size limitation is useless, spamc has a smaller default limit.
I
Anyone seen these lately? The spam consists of a multi-mb .pps between 3 and
as of this occurance 6.8mb. I've got my procmail recipe for calling sa set to
3mb currently:
:0 fw : $ASSASSINLOCK
* < 300
| /usr/bin/spamc -f
will it be worth it to adjust upwards? This not a mail server but just
