On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:37:19 +
RW wrote:
> I'm seeing 299 hits on rules that contain XPRIO in the rule name, but
> only 1 of these is on XPRIO itself.
That should be "299 hits in spam"
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:10:54 -0800
Dave Warren wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> We've had a rash of false positives in the last couple of weeks,
> almost exclusively tipping the scales is one particular hit:
>
> 3.5 XPRIO Has X-Priority header
>
> This seems to be scored fairl
Howdy!
We've had a rash of false positives in the last couple of weeks, almost
exclusively tipping the scales is one particular hit:
3.5 XPRIO Has X-Priority header
This seems to be scored fairly high for what it is as some mobile
devices are inserting this header on all of their mes
