Re: 3.1.0 X-headers

2005-09-18 Thread JamesDR
Mike Bostock wrote: In your message regarding Re: 3.1.0 X-headers dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:29:33 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea said that ... DCWO- Bowie Bailey wrote: From: Mike Bostock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just gone from 3.1.0.rc1 -> 3.1.0 (14/9/05) Sendmail/Procmail MTAs The X-hea

Re: 3.1.0 X-headers

2005-09-15 Thread Mike Bostock
In your message regarding Re: 3.1.0 X-headers dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:29:33 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea said that ... >DCWO- Bowie Bailey wrote: > > From: Mike Bostock [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>Just gone from 3.1.0.rc1 -> 3.1.0 (14/9/05) Sendmail/Procmail MTAs &g

Re: 3.1.0 X-headers

2005-09-15 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Bowie Bailey wrote: From: Mike Bostock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Just gone from 3.1.0.rc1 -> 3.1.0 (14/9/05) Sendmail/Procmail MTAs The X-headers for SpamAssassin are now appearing at the top of the header instead of the bottom It's a feature. One that was in rc1 too (and I believe all of

RE: 3.1.0 X-headers

2005-09-15 Thread Bowie Bailey
From: Mike Bostock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Just gone from 3.1.0.rc1 -> 3.1.0 (14/9/05) Sendmail/Procmail MTAs > The X-headers for SpamAssassin are now appearing at the top of the > header instead of the bottom > > Is there a config option I have missed? It's a feature. >From the release a

3.1.0 X-headers

2005-09-15 Thread Mike Bostock
Just gone from 3.1.0.rc1 -> 3.1.0 (14/9/05) Sendmail/Procmail MTAs The X-headers for SpamAssassin are now appearing at the top of the header instead of the bottom Is there a config option I have missed? Thanks -- Mike