OK, I'll forget identd...
Sometimes it is hard for me to resist trying things like that
"because they are there".
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:33 PM, John Rudd wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Steve Martin wrote:
2) Does anyone know a good working identd
this is a contradiction in terms.
On Aug 13, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Steve Martin wrote:
2) Does anyone know a good working identd
this is a contradiction in terms. "Good" and "working" cannot coexist
with "identd". Ok, I guess you could say that "an identd which
accurately implements the identd protocol is 'working'", but that
My mistake.
I wasn't looking to closely just saw the list of things it said
weren't installed.
I guess it isn't a big deal, but now that I've started down the path
of trying to get it working ...
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Michael Parker wrote:
Steve Martin wrote:
I'm getting ready
Steve Martin wrote:
> I'm getting ready for 3.1 and noticed one of the prerequisites is
> Net::Ident.
Correction, one of the optional modules.It is not required.
Why gave you the idea that it was a required module?
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I'm getting ready for 3.1 and noticed one of the prerequisites is
Net::Ident.
MacOS 10.4 no longer includes an ident daemon so I scrounged about a
bit and found one...
http://www.macmax.org/article.php3?id_article=39
But, it fails test 6 of the Net::Ident install (it still works after
th
