On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:54:56 +0200
Axb wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 05:07 PM, RW wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:58:27 +0200
> > Axb wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
> >>> Axb wrote:
> >>>
>
> have you verified that some of these are
On 10/15/2014 12:54 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 09:19 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
I propose to simplify, and move the code-wise exclusion to a config file
too: one tuneable (and one location to look at) is better than two.
Besides, the config file is far easier to read for th
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 09:19 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> I propose to simplify, and move the code-wise exclusion to a config file
> too: one tuneable (and one location to look at) is better than two.
> Besides, the config file is far easier to read for the not so
> regex-capable admin :)
>
That so
this, if we think
MailScanner headers are common enough to warrant this?
I also note that your 23_bayes_ignore_header.cf file has:
bayes_ignore_header X-ServerMaster-MailScanner
but that only covers one particular MailScanner user.
that creeped in when merging Reindl's data
removed
common enough to warrant this?
I also note that your 23_bayes_ignore_header.cf file has:
bayes_ignore_header X-ServerMaster-MailScanner
but that only covers one particular MailScanner user.
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com - Quality web sites
Tel. 01903 867 810
Fonant Ltd is registered in England
On 10/14/2014 11:54 PM, Axb wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 05:07 PM, RW wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:58:27 +0200
>> Axb wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
Axb wrote:
>
> have you verified that some of these are not included?
>
>
From: Axb
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:37:36 +0200
On 10/14/2014 11:08 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200 Axb wrote:
>>> and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
>>> not, I've removed all header entries which are not directly
Am 14.10.2014 um 23:37 schrieb Axb:
On 10/14/2014 11:08 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200 Axb wrote:
and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
not, I've removed all header entries which are not directly related
to AV/filter products.
On 10/14
On 10/14/2014 05:07 PM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:58:27 +0200
Axb wrote:
On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
Axb wrote:
have you verified that some of these are not included?
X-Originating-IP will not be included as it can be used to help
detect ham
On 10/14/2014 11:08 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200 Axb wrote:
and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
not, I've removed all header entries which are not directly related
to AV/filter products.
On 10/14/2014 07:17 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200 Axb wrote:
>> and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
>> not, I've removed all header entries which are not directly related
>> to AV/filter products.
On 10/14/2014 07:17 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> I'm not sure I agree with being
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:58:27 +0200
Axb wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
> > Axb wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> have you verified that some of these are not included?
> >>
> >> X-Originating-IP will not be included as it can be used to help
> >> detect ham or
On 10/14/2014 04:17 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200
Axb wrote:
and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
not, I've removed all header entries which are not directly related
to AV/filter products.
I'm not sure I agree with being too clev
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200
Axb wrote:
> and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
> not, I've removed all header entries which are not directly related
> to AV/filter products.
I'm not sure I agree with being too clever about Bayes. Surely by its
very nature,
On 10/14/2014 09:08 AM, Axb wrote:
Updated (in case you're using it.)
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/axb/23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
not, I've removed all header entries whi
Am 14.10.2014 um 15:47 schrieb Axb:
On 10/14/2014 03:34 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 10/14/2014 02:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.10.2014 um 13:58 schrieb Axb:
On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
Axb wrote:
have you verified that some of these are not inc
On 10/14/2014 03:34 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 10/14/2014 02:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.10.2014 um 13:58 schrieb Axb:
On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
Axb wrote:
have you verified that some of these are not included?
X-Originating-IP will not be i
On 10/14/2014 02:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 14.10.2014 um 13:58 schrieb Axb:
>> On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
>>> Axb wrote:
have you verified that some of these are not included?
X-Originating-IP will not be included as it can
Am 14.10.2014 um 13:58 schrieb Axb:
On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
Axb wrote:
have you verified that some of these are not included?
X-Originating-IP will not be included as it can be used to help
detect ham or spam
It's really no different to other he
On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
Axb wrote:
have you verified that some of these are not included?
X-Originating-IP will not be included as it can be used to help
detect ham or spam
It's really no different to other headers you are ignoring.
for example
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
Axb wrote:
>
> have you verified that some of these are not included?
>
> X-Originating-IP will not be included as it can be used to help
> detect ham or spam
It's really no different to other headers you are ignoring.
In particular X-Delivered-To can be very
On 10/14/2014 10:50 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 14/10/2014 10:44, Axb ha scritto:
have you verified that some of these are not included?
Yes, twice.
X-Originating-IP will not be included as it can be used to help detect
ham or spam
Ok, thanks
sorted / uniq'd / commited
Il 14/10/2014 10:44, Axb ha scritto:
have you verified that some of these are not included?
Yes, twice.
X-Originating-IP will not be included as it can be used to help detect
ham or spam
Ok, thanks
repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/axb/23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
I suggest these:
from qmail-scanner:
bayes_ignore_header X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics
bayes_ignore_header X-Qmail-Scanner-MOVED-X-Spam-Status
bayes_ignore_header X-Originating-IP
from cloudmark:
bayes_ignore_header X-Spam
Il 14/10/2014 09:08, Axb ha scritto:
Updated (in case you're using it.)
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/axb/23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
I suggest these:
from qmail-scanner:
bayes_ignore_header X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics
bayes_ignore_header X-
On 10/14/2014 10:08 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 14.10.2014 um 09:08 schrieb Axb:
Updated (in case you're using it.)
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/axb/23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
i am not really sure
but include
bayes_ignore_header X-ge
Am 14.10.2014 um 09:08 schrieb Axb:
> Updated (in case you're using it.)
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/axb/23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
>
i am not really sure
but include
bayes_ignore_header X-getmail-filter-classifier
might be a go
Updated (in case you're using it.)
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/axb/23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
28 matches
Mail list logo
