Re: messages that appear to be identical, ~2 minutes apart - one spam, one not

On 2014.11.04 11.37, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > I didn't look at the emails but most of these appear to be reactive > network-based tests like RBL and Razor/Pyzor. It would make complete > sense that it might slip by and then be caught in the future. On 2014.11.04 12.00, Bowie Bailey wrote: Sinc

Re: messages that appear to be identical, ~2 minutes apart - one spam, one not

On 11/4/2014 11:33 AM, btb wrote: hello- i've noticed lately a trend in which two messages which appear to be identical arrive a few minutes apart, and one is marked as spam while the other is not. aside from time stamps, queue ids, etc, i believe the headers and content of the two messages

Re: messages that appear to be identical, ~2 minutes apart - one spam, one not

On 11/4/2014 11:33 AM, btb wrote: i've noticed lately a trend in which two messages which appear to be identical arrive a few minutes apart, and one is marked as spam while the other is not. aside from time stamps, queue ids, etc, i believe the headers and content of the two messages to be ide

messages that appear to be identical, ~2 minutes apart - one spam, one not

hello- i've noticed lately a trend in which two messages which appear to be identical arrive a few minutes apart, and one is marked as spam while the other is not. aside from time stamps, queue ids, etc, i believe the headers and content of the two messages to be identical. i can see obviou

Re: One SPAM that got through

- "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: > Hi, > > I just had this message get through :- > > > and it only scored 5.6. These are the rules it hit :- > > 1.23 ADVANCE_FEE_2 > 0.00 BAYES_50 > 0.72 SARE_URGBIZ Contains urgent matter > -0.00 SPF_P

Re: One SPAM that got through

--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: Hi, I just had this message get through :- and it only scored 5.6. These are the rules it hit :- 1.23 ADVANCE_FEE_2 0.00 BAYES_50 0.72 SARE_URGBIZ Contains urgent matter -0.00 SPF_PASS 2.08 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 1.58 URG_BIZ Looks like you might want to do some

One SPAM that got through

Hi, I just had this message get through :- Subject: CONTACT GLOBAL COMPANY FOR YOUR $950,000.00 My Dear Good Friend, I have Paid the fee for your Cheque Draft. But the manager of Eko Bank Benin told me that before the check will get to you that it will expire. So I told him to cash the $950,

One spam offer definitely not worth it..

"Invoice #: 33021 - TOTAL: $15.00 We Email Advertise Your Web Site to 0,000,000 People" Wow! Only $15 for..er..nothing! Happy New Year etc. to all - and my eternal thanks for everyone involved in the discussion, support and development of SpamAssassin and associated tools - my life would be hel

span float obfuscation (was: one SPAM)

On Sunday, April 23, 2006 3:36 PM +0900 MATSUDA Yoh-ichi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: describe OBFUSCATING_FLOAT d Thanks, I was looking for a rule for this. Have you considered submitting it to the devs?

Re: one SPAM

Hello, Razvan-san. I searched in my this ML's mailbox for finding "span float" spam, so I found your mail. From: Razvan Cosma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: one SPAM Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:48:20 +0300 > Hi, > > Michael Monnerie wrote: > > On Donnersta

Re: one SPAM

On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Razvan Cosma wrote: > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:01:41 ??? The cruft in the Date: header may be a good spam sign. > X-MS-Has-Attach: > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Those two headers being present and empty may be a very good spam sign. -- John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746h

Re: one SPAM

Hi, Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Donnerstag, 20. April 2006 14:28 Razvan Cosma wrote: > >> Body formatting varies slightly, text remains the same. >> > > Then write some body rules that catch the text. > > I have no idea how to do that.. what the user reads on the screen is "Your credit