> Hello Listmaster or whoever will read it,
add spf to freenet.de would help the clueless :-)
From: Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: --max-children setting, consider raising it
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha
Am 2008-02-25 23:28:39, schrieb fchan:
> Hi,
> I don't mind taking RAM since I have 3GB. I can raise the amount of
> child processes and I wanted to find out how much RAM does each child
> takes so I can decide how many max children to raise it without
> killing my system. Also I would like to c
I was doing in my /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd on my RedHat
linux system.
spamd -d -m 20 -H
I'm having 20 max child processes now and curious why I'm still
seeing these messages.
Thank you,
Frank
--max-children setting, consider raising it>
I'm still getting these error messag
--max-children setting, consider raising it>
> I'm still getting these error messages in my log:
>
>
> server reached --max-children setting, consider raising it
>
You get that message if your spamd has less children than you mail server has
smtp threads. I have only -
.
> SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -m 20 -H"
> SPAMD_PID=/var/run/spamd.pid
Did you restart the service after you changed the option?
> I'm still getting these error messages in my log:
> server reached --max-children setting, consider raising it
Well, how many children *are* act
rror messages in my log:
server reached --max-children setting, consider raising it
Am I supposed to set it here or some other place? I see that
spamd.conf and it is supposed to be in /etc but I don't have
spamd.conf there so should I make one?
Thank you,
Frank
