On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 05:53 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The IXHASH was originally developed for just that context: if the same mail
> is sent to almost
> everybody in a <50 usergroup, the recipients are likely not to want it.
That seems wrong to me - what about mailing lists, newsletters et
Hi,
from your description it seems that an "I have seen this before" component
would do well.
The IXHASH was originally developed for just that context: if the same mail is
sent to almost
everybody in a <50 usergroup, the recipients are likely not to want it.
Consideration (if you want to handl
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:19:56PM -0500, Rubin Bennett wrote:
> I have pretty much every test on the planet being run (see list below)
> and updated via Rules_Du_Jour on the SpamAssassin side of things, and
You don't seem to be using sa-update...
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"I'm convinced tha
On Monday 04 December 2006 5:19 pm, Rubin Bennett wrote:
> Ok, so like the rest of you, I've been getting swamped by stock and
> other spam for the past couple of months. I've been beating me head on
> the wall trying to come up with the magic combination of things that
> make my client's SpamAssa
Rubin Bennett wrote:
SpamAssassin 3.1.5,
FuzzyOCR 3.4.2
Rules_du_jour:
TRUSTED_RULESETS="
TRIPWIRE
ANTIDRUG
SARE_EVILNUMBERS0
SARE_EVILNUMBERS1
SARE_EVILNUMBERS2
RANDOMVAL
BOGUSVIRUS
SARE_ADULT
SARE_FRAUD
SARE_BML
SARE_SPOOF
SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM
SARE_OEM
SARE_RANDOM
SARE_HEADER
SARE_HEADER_ENG
Ok, so like the rest of you, I've been getting swamped by stock and
other spam for the past couple of months. I've been beating me head on
the wall trying to come up with the magic combination of things that
make my client's SpamAssassin installations work as well as my own. And
Now I prostrate m
