Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Spamassassin and SpamCopURI

2004-10-27 Thread Jeff Chan
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 8:36:21 AM, Frank Johansen wrote: > Sorry for being a bit quick with my last mail. I got it to work now, was > just an erroneously newline that got into the rules files when I cut & pasted. Yes, I should have mentioned those rules are on three lines and one of the li

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Spamassassin and SpamCopURI

2004-10-26 Thread Frank Tore Johansen
Sorry for being a bit quick with my last mail. I got it to work now, was just an erroneously newline that got into the rules files when I cut & pasted. -Frank.

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Spamassassin and SpamCopURI

2004-10-26 Thread Frank Tore Johansen
Thanks. I did the changes you illustrated below (into spamassassin/spamcop_uri.cf). The "make test" errors went away, so I went ahead and did "make install" of SpamAssassin 2.64, as well as a reinstall of SpamCopURI-0.22 (just in case). I also removed the old override in local.cf and skip_rb

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Spamassassin and SpamCopURI

2004-10-26 Thread Jeff Chan
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 1:40:05 AM, Frank Johansen wrote: > Hi, I'm in the progress of upgrading SA from 2.63 to 2.64 and SpamCopURI > from 0.19 to 0.22. The syntax for the SpamCopURI 0.22 rules is new to reflect use of the combined list multi.surbl.org, so please update them to look like th