On 19.02.2011 23:41, mouss wrote:
Le 19/02/2011 04:58, Frank Reppin a écrit :
Hi list,
Ok - think of it as beeing solved.
I could make something 'useful' after
digging more in HeaderEval.pm.
did you take a look at the code that implements DATE_IN_FUTURE_* rules?
Yes - this was quite useful
Le 19/02/2011 04:58, Frank Reppin a écrit :
> Hi list,
>
> Ok - think of it as beeing solved.
> I could make something 'useful' after
> digging more in HeaderEval.pm.
>
did you take a look at the code that implements DATE_IN_FUTURE_* rules?
> But later then... this raises another issue.
> I'll
Hi list,
Ok - think of it as beeing solved.
I could make something 'useful' after
digging more in HeaderEval.pm.
But later then... this raises another issue.
I'll open a separate thread on this one.
Thanks.
frank\
--
43rd Law of Computing:
Anything that can go wr
fortune: Segmentation