Re: [SA] Rule and Rule

2009-10-13 Thread Adam Katz
Mark Martinec wrote: > Adam, > > Btw, channels only provide the khop-sc-neighbors.sa.khopesh.com for > SA 3.3.0, but not the khop-bl.sa.khopesh.com, > khop-blessed.sa.khopesh.com, and khop-general.sa.khopesh.com . First: It's awesome to see interest in my channels! Second: you are correct. I

Re: [SA] Rule and Rule

2009-10-13 Thread Mark Martinec
Adam, > That example may have been overly simplistic, but I thought it conveyed > the idea. To see a real-world example, see KHOP_DNSBL_ADJ in > http://khopesh.com/sa/khop-bl/khop-bl.cf (though please use the actual > channel if you're going to use my rules, otherwise you won't get updates). Btw

Re: [SA] Rule and Rule

2009-10-11 Thread Adam Katz
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: >> Here's my workaround. It involves some redundancy, but it does the trick: > > After some brief moment of head scratching... > > The "workaround" basically is just weighting sub-rules in the meta, and > works regardless if it is meant to be the individual sub-rules'