Re: [Possible SPAM] Re: [Possible SPAM] trustedrelays

2007-04-25 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Chris wrote: What I'm trying to figure out Daryl is what would be added to my trusted_networks config line to reflect embarq and or synacor. Previously this is all I had on that line, 127/8 192.168/16 207.217.121/24 209.86.93/24. Since I'm now 'in between' hosts, meaning that El is forwarding

[Possible SPAM] Re: [Possible SPAM] trustedrelays

2007-04-25 Thread Chris
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 4:34 pm, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Chris wrote: > > [2474] dbg: metadata: X-Spam-Relays-Trusted: [ ip=127.0.0.1 > > rdns=localhost.localdomain helo=localhost by=mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com > > ident= envfrom= intl=1 id=8B8062336D7 auth= ] [ ip=127.0.0.1 rdns= > > helo=

Re: [Possible SPAM] trustedrelays

2007-04-25 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Chris wrote: [2474] dbg: metadata: X-Spam-Relays-Trusted: [ ip=127.0.0.1 rdns=localhost.localdomain helo=localhost by=mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com ident= envfrom= intl=1 id=8B8062336D7 auth= ] [ ip=127.0.0.1 rdns= helo=mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com by=localhost ident= envfrom= intl=1 id=jfvuG0

[Possible SPAM] trustedrelays

2007-04-24 Thread Chris
I'm 'trying' to get things back to normal after the switch from earthlink to my dsl provider, embarq. I'm reading the wiki page regarding this and ran spamassassin -D -t on a test message I had sent to myself. I'm confused about the results below: [2474] dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=127