On Saturday 05 May 2007 10:31 pm, Loren Wilton wrote:
> tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, PYZOR_CHECK=3.7]
>
> > Though they did not tag it as spam, they still have a mis-configured
> > setup,
> > note the [ALL_TRUSTED].
>
> Also note the Bayes_00. If they have bayes trained to thi
tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, PYZOR_CHECK=3.7]
Though they did not tag it as spam, they still have a mis-configured
setup,
note the [ALL_TRUSTED].
Also note the Bayes_00. If they have bayes trained to think spam is ham,
they have a problem.
Loren
On Sunday 29 April 2007 10:58 am, Julius VWilliam wrote:
> Our Last pick Doubled
> We now bring you a new winner
> Announcing CRITICAL CARE NEW
I know Justin already noted how this slipped through but thought I'd paste my
mail providers (Embarq/Synacor) markup:
Old-X-Spam-Score: -0.699
Old-X-Spa
