This is the OP of this issue.
I would like to report that my problem, after weeks of issue (That I didn't
have time to deal with it and so I just used the delete button as my spam
filter) seems to be unconditionally corrected.
What did I do?
I just posted my problem here, that is all. Now I do
I have 52 of these sitting in my inbox this morning when I came in to work.
this is just the beginning. I get literally hundreds of these a day and
Spamassassin does not even check them.
Thats hundreds of these every day for weeks and weeks and weeks on end.
-W
Received: (qmail 21696 invoke
I have been getting bombarded for weeks with these and even tho I have
created specific rules in LOCAL.cf, Spamassassin refuses to even check these
bogus obvious spam and potentially virus emails.
I get literally 100+ of these a day.
-W
Received: (qmail 11856 invoked by uid 110); 2 Mar 2010 16
I have not received the digest for two days, is it broken?
Thanks,
Wes
I think I started getting this config error again during sa-update a couple of
days ago. I thought it had gone away but now it seems it is back. I haven't
done anything or changed anything at all outside of sa-update run by a cron.
I run spamassassin --lint and there are no errors.
The cron rep
Thanks everyone for the facebook feedback.
Indeed this did happen and begin after Oct 26th. I believe our registration
began closer to Nov 1st.
It's relieving that this appears to be coincidence and is not a local virus,
keylogger, undetected VPS break in, etc.
My spamassassin is set up as
This may not be an exact Spamassassin type question, but something happened to
me recently concerning spam and I am hoping to get some feedback and thoughts
about it.
I have 3 websites on a VPS and with that several related email addresses.
help@, support@, etc; I also have a customer that I ho
How do I add a mail server as trusted and score it negative?
I need to have mail from a specific site not tagged as spam. I have the domain
name and the IP.
Thanks,
Wes
So what makes a spammer want to use a valid email address as a return or
reply-to address to catch all the undeliverable, failure and bounced email that
occures when sending UBE spam.
Is there some legitimacy with spam detection on an email that contains a valid
reply-to email address?
To me
I have a post I have tried several times over the last week to post to this
forum and it never seems to get posted. I don't understand why?
There is nothing exotic about it, just text, a question and email header info
I pasted.
Any idea whats up?
Thanks,
Wes
So I (think) I know that if SA is sent a message of a specific large size, SA
will not process it (Recent thread here) and I also (think) I know that if the
server is overyly busy, etc. that SA will not check the email. Now I may be
totally wrong about this, but my assumptions are based on feedb
I get:
* -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low
* trust
and I read the dnswl.org home page, but I don't understand why this rule would
get a -1.0 for a "LOW" trust rating.
It just seems awkward to me, I think LOW trust would dictate a posi
I'm writing rules for header Subject and have a rule question.
I want a rule that would hit on specific words, no matter what order they were.
Would a rule written like this rule below accomplish that?
Is the " * " redundant and not needed?
Would a rule written like this be more efficient an
nothing the SPAMMERS can send that can't be filtered to a high degree.
It's not about eliminating, it's about minimizing.
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, twofers wrote:
> so why not let them show us what they've got, show us where we need to
> make adjustments and corrections a
Charles,
Although I understand your reservations, I feel in this case that it's best to
lay it all out there and give it to them, let them do what they do. In my mind
it's nothing more than "Flushing" out the best they can offer and finding the
loopholes, and closing them up.
There are more
I am mainly using the rule to check the header subject, I haven't added it to a
body check.
So, between the 3 choices:
1. /(?:[^_]{1,30}_+){5}/
2. /\S+_+\S+_+\S+/
3. R02 /^\S{30,}$/m
Which covers the most territory given the example I submitted? I'm basically
interested in identifying those
Neil Rocks !
Thanks Neil.
Wes
--- On Thu, 7/16/09, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
From: Neil Schwartzman
Subject: Re: Opt In Spam
To: "twofers" , "Spamassassin"
Date: Thursday, July 16, 2009, 1:29 PM
FOLLOW-UP:
A process was hung on one of the 20 hives serving the whi
How can I pattern match when every word has an underscore after it.
Example:
This_sentenance_has_an_underscore_after_every_word
I'm not really good at Perl pattern matching, but \w and \W see an underscore
as a word character, so I'm just not sure what might work.
body =~ /^([a-z]+_+)+/i
Is tha
And yet another SPAM from these opt-in guys.
I believe this group are nothing but covert Spammers abusing a privilage
afforded them.
I receive these spams at two separate email addresses, both I use exclusively
for my business, there is no way I'd use these addresses as an opt-in for
anythin
I am writing some new local rules to my local.cf, so I am watching the headers
of emails I receive and I notice this rule that appears in an obvious spam
email:
* -4.3 HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI RBL: Habeas Accredited Opt-In or Better
Subject: Value Product Offers from Admints and Zagabor
Otherwis
Have you run spamassassin -D --lint? to check for syntax, etc. errors?
Wes
Chris Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Wes!
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, twofers wrote:
> Are you saying that you have separate rules in user_prefs and those rules are
> not being processed? or are
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sorry, I there's no bayes files in /etc/mail/spamassassin/ directory. I'm
using MailScanner.
twofers wrote:
>
> You can try:
> mkdir /var/lib/MailScanner/
> #Creates the directory
>
> cp /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes* /var/lib/MailScan
What tool, or maybe I already have it and don't know it, can I use to get email
stastics on my server and domains? Like total emails, those tagged as spam, etc?
I have FC2, qmail, Spamassassin 3.1.7
Is sa-tools helpful? Is it worth installing?
Thanks,
Wes
---
I would like to know what local rule I could invoke to tag email that the
subject is not in english.
header NOT_IN_ENGLISH Subject !~ /English/i
describe NOT_IN_ENGLISH Subject Contains Non English Characters
score NOT_IN_ENGLISH 3.5
What regexp could
I'm sure the FTC and US Attorny General's office would like to know about this.
All you have to do is write a a letter addressed to Attn: of Consumer Affairs
and these guys will check it outin a big way.
Wes
Thomas Lindell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone had any dealings w
You can try:
mkdir /var/lib/MailScanner/
#Creates the directory
cp /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes* /var/lib/MailScanner/
#Copies the bayes databases from the default spamassassin directory to the
bayes_path directory
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart or /etc/init.d/psa-spamassassin
Are you saying that you have separate rules in user_prefs and those rules are
not being processed? or are you talking about just configuration lines in
user_prefs like use_bayes 1?
Wes
Chris Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I am using spamd and calling spamc from .procmail usi
rward this out to the SA community if you want.
AltGrendel"
I am trying to piece together the information that was in the wiki using
google cache, wayback, etc. In the meantime, you can get the script
itself from http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour
Chris Thielen
twofers wrote:
>
I'm just doing some basic testing and what I think should be tagged as spam
just goes right on thru.
I've added this to local.cf
headerMY_RULESubject =~ /test/i
describe MY_RULE There is test in the Subject
score MY_RULE100
I restart spamassassin.
Then
e. :(
Any suggestion ?
Thank you!
-----
From: twofers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 3:18 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hi !
Cristi,
Have you tried lowering your required_score to something like between 5 and
7 ?
Cristi,
Have you tried lowering your required_score to something like between 5 and 7
?
also change rewrite_header Subject SPAM(_SCORE_) to:
rewrite_header subject SPAM(_SCORE_)
Keep it lower case.
You can also run spamassassin -D --lint to check for s
being to cautious?
http://www.5dollarwhitebox.org/wiki/index.php/Howtos_Spam_Assassin_Rules_Du_Jour_Configuration
Thanks for checking it out.
Wes
twofers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.5dollarwhitebox.org/wiki/index.php/Howtos_Spam_Assassin_Rules_Du_Jour_Configu
http://www.5dollarwhitebox.org/wiki/index.php/Howtos_Spam_Assassin_Rules_Du_Jour_Configuration
Forgot it...
Then what about this link to a RDJ ?
Is it valid? I don't want to mistakenly put something on my server that will
give me problems.
Wes
twofers <[EMAIL P
sage-
> > From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 1:51 PM
> > To: twofers
> > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Rules Du Jour briken?
> >
> >
> > twofers wrote:
> > > Is this link
Is this link having problems that anyone knows of?
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
I can't get to Rules Du Jour.
Thanks,
Wes
-
Sponsored Link
$420,000 Mortgage for $1,399/month - Think You Pay Too Much For Your
Mortga
I have found very little helpful information about running SA in Plesk. I'm
trying to learn all that I can, but it seems info is pretty sparse. I apologize
for the length and depth of my message.
1. I have tried putting some "canned" .cf files into /etc/mail/spamassassin/
and have discover
tell me what I might be doing wrong? or am I just totally off base? Thanks.Karl Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 02:06 -0800, twofers wrote:> I am trying to find out if I can change some prefs so that the new> user_prefs file will contain my prefs when it
If this helps... [22325] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all[22325] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG[22325] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.1.5[22325] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen.[22325] dbg: util: running in taint mode? yes[22325] dbg: util: taint mode: deleting unsafe environment va
Can someone help me understand what this means? Whats broken? [EMAIL PROTECTED] .spamassassin]# sa-learn --dump data bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting! at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm line 196. bayes: bayes db version 0 is not abl
Thanks Karl and Nick, Yes, the new account user_prefs is being created (I'm creating it from Plesk BTW) however the new user_prefs seems to be created with default values from I don't know where and not those values in either of the two .template files. That's my problem in a nut shell. May
I am re-submitting this question for help: I have searched for several hours and can't seem to find the answer to this. I've found close answers, but not complete. I have SA set up as individual users. When a new user is created SA creates a new user_prefs file for them. This file contains
I have searched for several hours and can't seem to find the answer to this. I've found close answers, but not complete. I have SA set up as individual users. When a new user is created SA creates a new user_prefs file for them. This file contains two prefs. required_score 7 and rewrite_header
42 matches
Mail list logo
