That loks like it, is there anyway of having a different report if the
mail is identified as spam cf identified as ham?
On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 20:16 +0100, Patrick von der Hagen wrote:
> tom wright wrote:
> > This dosnt seem to have solved the issue. I'm using the
> > exisc
5-29-12 at 08:28 -0500, tom wright wrote:
> Interesting, it looks like I could be calling spamassassin twice (both
> through spamc). Once through exim and once with maildrop. I've turned
> off the maildrop call and am waiting to see what happens.
>
> On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 1
Interesting, it looks like I could be calling spamassassin twice (both
through spamc). Once through exim and once with maildrop. I've turned
off the maildrop call and am waiting to see what happens.
On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 11:46 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> tom wright wrote:
> > Hi fo
Hi folks,
First time posting here so thanks in advance for any assistance. Looking
at my email headers it appears spamassassin is doing an excellent job of
classifying my email but in the X-Spam-Status header, even when a mail
is classified as ham I still get a summary message. I'm guessing this is
