Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 29.10.07 10:19, tad1214 wrote:
>> Ok so I just threw a few hundred (thousand?) hams at it, we will see if
>> that
>> helps, here is my dump magic
>>
>> 0.000 0 110832 0 non-token data: nspam
>&
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 29.10.07 08:18, tad1214 wrote:
>> I have bayes set to auto learn on a catchall account, which I am now
>> thinking
>> is a bad Idea, and now everything that is sent is pretty much flagged as
>> 99-100% Chance spam by bayes. Usu
I have bayes set to auto learn on a catchall account, which I am now thinking
is a bad Idea, and now everything that is sent is pretty much flagged as
99-100% Chance spam by bayes. Usually that is it, but sometimes there are
little other things that are getting FP's. I am fairly new to Spam Assass
