Antwort: RE: Idea for new SA Rule

2006-04-05 Thread srunschke
"Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 05.04.2006 17:11:10: > > 1) FPs on highly technical mail due to words not known to the spell > > checker. > > I hadn't thought of that, but people who are dealing with highly > technical e-mails would probably also be able to customize their > local

Antwort: sa-learn & Lotus Notes

2006-04-05 Thread srunschke
Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 04.04.2006 23:13:08: > There have been numerous threads on how to have end users drop > misclassified mail to spam/ham folders in Exchange, but I don't recall > seeing any mention of a way of doing this with Notes. > > Is anyone doing this with Not

Possible to leave Bayes scoring intact, but not have it count towards total spamscore?

2006-01-25 Thread srunschke
Hi all, I want to throw the newly built Bayes DB onto our mailservers, but for testing purposes I do not want any Bayes score to influence the final spamscore, but nevertheless I want it to become visible in the spam_report. Basically I want to see how often Bayes matches ham/spam, without it hav

Antwort: Re: Bayes - how bad is a small ham corpus with a big spam corpus?

2006-01-18 Thread srunschke
Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 17.01.2006 03:41:39: > sad> I'm currently trying to build up a new bayes DB here, ... > sad> ... yet it poses a problem to build up the ham part. > sad> ... Much of the inbound smtp mail either contains private or > sad> confidential information, so I

Antwort: Re: [exim] Exim4 and SA: Overloading the system

2006-01-18 Thread srunschke
Patrick von der Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 17.01.2006 20:47:52: > PS: more RAM usually is a good idea but situations have been reported, > where adding memory just killed performance, so be careful with such > generalizations. There have been Intel-mainboard-chipsets with > 2nd-level-

Bayes - how bad is a small ham corpus with a big spam corpus?

2006-01-16 Thread srunschke
Hi list, I'm currently trying to build up a new bayes DB here, since the autobuilt DB fubared (as expected, no need to throw things at me ;)). It's rather easy to build up the spam part, as we are getting right enough of it, yet it poses a problem to build up the ham part. Much of our mail comin

Are certain tokens problematic in messages for sa-learn?

2005-12-21 Thread srunschke
Hi all, For clarification I'll sketch the flow of our mail to sa-learn. Internet -> 2 redundant Exim mailservers with SA -> 2 redundant Notes server -> User -> Spam DB on Notes server -> via fetchmail back to the Exim server -> sa-learn That will of course add at least a new received: line

Antwort: I have written a script !!!

2005-12-05 Thread srunschke
Christian Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 03.12.2005 15:12:17: > optionaly _IF_YOU_TRUST_ME_ you may put a crontab to download > it from time to time from the upper location ... someting like > > * * * * * wget wget -q "http://mx.homelinux.org/spamassassin"; > --output-document="/etc/cron

Using sa-learn with Notes/Domino Servers via agents

2005-11-23 Thread srunschke
Hi list, I have the following setup: 2 Exim servers as incoming and outgoing relay in the DMZ using SA to tag messages. They deliver messages to 2 Domino servers in the DMZ, which then route the messages to the central Domino server for further routing. I recently had to delete the Bayes DB be