> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > > Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > > > > Am I in
Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > > Am I in the wrong list with this question?
> > > > Mar 13 01
Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > Am I in the wrong list with this question?
> > > Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> > > <[EMAIL PROTE
Are there problems with mail header identification?
Am I in the wrong list with this question?
Thanks
Lars Dierich
> Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
> Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in
> concatenation (.) or
I upgraded from 2.64 to 3.0.2 via CPAN with no problems.
Yes, I read
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/UPGRADE
und did change my local.cf.
1) Now Mail don't get tagged as spam
==
/va/log/mail
Mar 14 12:34:33 ns spamd[27959]: connection from localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1] at po
Am 14.03.2005 um 07:54 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> hi all
>
> is anyone using a tool that can parse "/var/log/messages" to find
> identified SPAM and is able to then build MTRG graphs ?
I use Mailgraph
http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~dws/software/mailgraph/
it uses the RRD to store the data.
Lars