Re: Chain content filters in Postfix

2015-03-11 Thread Roger Walters
Thank you both Axb and Reindl Harald for your answers. I finally tried Fuglu because I wanted to keep the rest of the scripts independent instead of integrating them into a milter, and seems that it works nicely, I didn't know that one! Thanks for this great hint! Regards, Roger 2015-03-

Chain content filters in Postfix

2015-03-10 Thread Roger Walters
_filter.py filter and act accordingly. Could someone shed some light on this? Thank you, Roger

Re: Increasing score based on membership to commercial whitelist

2011-09-25 Thread Roger Marquis
R 0 meta HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI 0 meta HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI 0 meta HABEAS_CHECKED 0 Roger Marquis

Re: Barracuda RBL in first place

2009-08-15 Thread Roger Marquis
(up to 4 or so, to avoid DNS timeouts). Postfix supports this with "warn_if_reject" before doing the actual "5XX" reject. It's the warnings that yield valid data, or at least they do with large and representative samples (which IME >= 100K msgs/day). Roger Marquis

Re: A difficult one to weed out?

2009-06-25 Thread Roger Marquis
LuKreme wrote: PostConf http://www.postconf.com for example. Looks interesting, but not FreBSD demo :/ Waiting only for a postfix port with an "overwrites-base" option. The code itself works with any postfix home directory. Roger Marquis

Re: A difficult one to weed out?

2009-06-24 Thread Roger Marquis
x27;t that complex, and some web front-ends implement them, for RBLs and RHSBLs, in block or warn-only modes, and generate reports based on the results. PostConf http://www.postconf.com for example. Roger Marquis

Re: config status

2009-03-02 Thread Roger Marquis
uld probably take a few hours to complete. Wish I had the time to do it for free. OTOH, if you have scripting skills it's pretty straightforward. The only time consuming part is parsing the data down to just the essential elements and formatting it for easy reading. A few dozen iterations and voila. Roger Marquis

RE: not seeing any advantage to sa-learn?

2009-02-28 Thread Roger Marquis
This is not correct. AWL is *not* taken into account for auto-learning. Did not mean to imply that it was. Apologies for the lack of clarity. Most of our negative experience has been with autolearn. Based on your post we are retesting AWL starting with a low threshold (0.1). Roger Marquis

Re: config status

2009-02-28 Thread Roger Marquis
absolutely essential for monitoring production Unix/Linux systems. Roger Marquis

RE: not seeing any advantage to sa-learn?

2009-02-27 Thread Roger Marquis
's) Bayes DBs become corrupt from autolearn / AWL... IME you'll have better results by manually processing only a small amount of representative ham and spam through sa-learn. By small I do mean only a few per week. Our Bayes Tips are online at: http://www.postconf.com/docs/bayes_tips.shtml Roger Marquis

SA behavior in Ensim Pro X Spam-Filter vs in MailScanner

2007-09-26 Thread 'Roger Ide'
er .conf file or two that might shed some light on this, but if anyone has a notion of what's going on here, I'd appreciate a tip. Thanks Roger Ide No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.30/1030 - Release Date: 9/25/2007 8:02 AM

james and spamassassin

2006-12-13 Thread roger
Hi. Is there anyone has experience in using Apache james working together with spamassassin to anti spam?my OS is linux Gentoo.I have read through the james Doc and spamassassin Doc,however I can't find anything useful.Thanks in advance. roger 2006-12-14

Bayes expiration question

2006-11-14 Thread Roger Taranto
lines mean, and what useful tweaking can be done based upon the output? -Roger

Re: Psst!

2006-10-25 Thread Roger Taranto
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 21:33, John Andersen wrote: > On Wednesday 25 October 2006 14:18, Roger Taranto wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 04:19, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > > Any suggestion to spread a spamtrap e-mail address? > > > > Every once in a while, I go to

Re: Psst!

2006-10-25 Thread Roger Taranto
If they're just using it to phish for valid addresses, then that's their problem. -Roger P.S. -- Thanks to Matt K. for pointing out sometime back that not only is spamtrap a bad name for a spam trap, but also that hamtrap is a bad name for an account to receive ham. I've seen some sp

Re: Very big auto-whitelist file

2006-08-31 Thread Roger Taranto
ation from someone who experienced it is welcome There's an additional tool to run after you run check_whitelist. It's called trim_whitelist, and it compacts the db file. I can't remember where I found it, but you should be able to google for it. It should reduce the size of your db file quite a bit. -Roger

Re: Proposal: First URI black list, how about email address black lists?

2006-05-20 Thread Roger Taranto
lf and turned it into a book. Check out http://www.thespamletters.com/ especially the conversations with the Nigerians. -Roger

Re: whitelist_from_spf is not working

2006-05-03 Thread Roger Taranto
o authenticate with his SPF, wouldn't it? Wouldn't > > that be a bad thing? > > Only from localhost to localhost... ie: this could never happen over the > internet, but you could send yourself mail on your own mailserver, forge > his domain and have it pass SPF. I have a related question: what about listing hosts in the 192.168 range? Would this be a bad thing? The reason I ask is that my dad's SPF record is listed as ~all for his externally-visible static IP address, but when machines internal to his network connect to send mail, they look forged since they have a 192.168 address. Suggestions? -Roger

Re: Non-English languages (was: xxxl spam)

2006-04-14 Thread Roger Taranto
sion vacations. Here's the related msnbc story: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11481528/ -Roger

Fwd: Razor2 is open and free.

2006-03-30 Thread Roger Taranto
I'm forwarding this from the Razor-users list with Vipul's permission. -Roger -Forwarded Message- > From: Vipul Ved Prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Razor-users] Razor2 is open and free. > Date: Thu, 30 Mar 20

Re: razor-whitelist never works

2006-03-17 Thread Roger Taranto
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 11:34, Matt Rossiter wrote: > Does anyone have some suggestions for me to try? You'll probably have better luck on the razor-users list: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users -Roger

Re: lots of new spam

2006-02-09 Thread Roger Jochem
Where do I upgrade my spamassassin cf files to the latest versions? Sorry if this is a dumb question... - Original Message - From: "Craig Baird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Payal Rathod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:36 PM Subject: Re: lots of new spam The

Re: OT: Spammers' reactions to rejection

2005-11-17 Thread Roger Taranto
s, too. :( My aunt tells this story about her father: he used to invite members of an annoying religious group that goes door-to-door in for hours on Saturday mornings. My aunt's mother used to get really upset with him for spending so much time with them. His explanation was that "at least this way I know where they are." -Roger

Re: German court rules e-mail blocking 'illegal'.

2005-01-19 Thread Roger WJ Alterskjær
. All users have been informed of this and are thereby free to do what they will with Spam-folder content. Some (including myself) have crontabs that remove old spam after a pre-determined number of days, weeks, or months. Also nice 'cause my backupserver skips .Spam- and .Trash-folders. ;-) -Roger

Re: add_header in 3.0.2 not working

2005-01-18 Thread Roger WJ Alterskjær
FYI, to anyone who runs into the same problem, there is a patched version of qmail-scanner.pl that allow you to include SA-created headers (plus other cool options not in the original): http://xoomer.virgilio.it/j.toribio/qmail-scanner/READMEpatched.html -Roger

Re: add_header in 3.0.2 not working

2005-01-18 Thread Roger WJ Alterskjær
on 18.01.2005 12:30 Roger WJ Alterskjær said the following: on 17.01.2005 19:47 Andy Jezierski said the following: [snip] I don't use qmail-scanner, but do you have to re-start it for new config changes to take effect? Does qmail-scanner have it's own config file that ov

Re: add_header in 3.0.2 not working

2005-01-18 Thread Roger WJ Alterskjær
ue. I imagine that the SA headers are kept when spamc is called. So, when I try to even mod my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.conf's add_header line with no effect, I get stumped. -Roger

Re: add_header in 3.0.2 not working

2005-01-17 Thread Roger WJ Alterskjær
Andy Jezierski wrote: Roger WJ Alterskjær <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/17/2005 10:27:20 AM: > Matt Kettler wrote: > > > At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote: > > > >> I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to >

Re: add_header in 3.0.2 not working

2005-01-17 Thread Roger WJ Alterskjær
Matt Kettler wrote: At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote: I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to get the add_header option working. Before I start: RH9, SA 3.0.2, spamd -d -c -m5 -u qscand, spamc called by qmail-scanner 1.24. In /etc/mail/sp

Re: add_header in 3.0.2 not working

2005-01-17 Thread Roger WJ Alterskjær
Matt Kettler wrote: At 09:53 AM 1/17/2005, Roger WJ Alterskjær wrote: I've recently upgraded SA from 2.64 to 3.0.2 and now can't seem to get the add_header option working. Before I start: RH9, SA 3.0.2, spamd -d -c -m5 -u qscand, spamc called by qmail-scanner 1.24. In /etc/mail/sp

add_header in 3.0.2 not working

2005-01-17 Thread Roger WJ Alterskjær
, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_ tests=_TESTS_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_ And yet I still get the default short report. I've been working on this for a few days and can't seem to wrap my head around this... -- Mvh, Roger WJ Alterskjær Edb-konsulent Vitenskapsmuseet, NTNU 73 59 79 78

webuserprefs-0.5.x

2004-11-04 Thread Roger Wolvington
Can anyone point me to a site where I can download webuserprefs-0.5? I've tried the author's site for a couple of weeks now but I can't get a response and it is not available on freshmeat.net now. Thanks, Roger -- R

Re: Oh the temptation......

2004-10-15 Thread Roger Taranto
crazed tonight. Someone has done this already.  Check out: http://thespamletters.com Some writer has replied to a lot of spam with the craziest things and a few have replied.  See the ongoing discussions he has had with some of the Nigerians. -Roger

Re: custom rule

2004-10-07 Thread Roger E. Rustad, Jr.
Ever since signing up with AllofMP3.com (a Russian MP3 site), I've been getting tons of e-mail like that. --- Gian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hill all, > > i'm using spamassassin 2.64, i want to reject body > message like this : > > -- > ÅóÓÑ£¡ÄãÓÐûÓÐÔÚÍøÉÏÏë¿´µçÓ°ÓÖÕÒ²»µ½ÕæÕýÃâ·ÑµÄÍøÕ¾µÄ¾­À

spam@uce.gov bouncing?

2004-09-19 Thread Roger E. Rustad, Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is anyone else's [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail bouncing? All the mail I've forwarded there over the last day or so has been getting returned with Delay reason: Connection refused Roger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1.1 iQA

Re: [OT] FUN: Something to send your family members!

2004-09-16 Thread Roger Taranto
http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/frustrations/388b/ And, this one is a personal favorite: http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/frustrations/6b6e/ -Roger

Re: Subject line

2004-09-14 Thread Roger E. Rustad, Jr.
I second that. Often ppl on the list will (b)cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org, so we need something like a [listserv name] subject header. Roger At 10:15 AM 9/14/2004, you wrote: Would it be possible to have emails to this list have something such as "[SA-LIST} Subject here" in t

Re: delivery to multiple mailboxes from single account

2004-09-12 Thread Roger Taranto
each time.  Is there a faster way to use this list? -Roger