Re: Trusted_networks

Drop the node part of the address i.e. if I wanted 10.1.1.0/24 use 10.1.1/24 Peter Russell-4 wrote: > > Hello, i notice after a lint test the following errors > [2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.1.0.0/16,' > [2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.2.0.0/16

spamassassin --lint error

I just recently added rules_du_jour script and I am trying to get it to work. A preliminary lint gives these lines: [25132] dbg: plugin: fixed relative path: /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/updates_spamassassin_org/80_additional.cf [25132] dbg: config: using "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/update

Re: [2] auto-learn learned_points

Thanks for the reply, but I think that you are referring to autolearn_points. As computed in PerMsgStatus.pm and is used in AutoLearningThreshold.pm. They are computed in the same function but they are not the same. Notice that in the get_autolearn_points autolearn_points is $score where learned

auto-learn learned_points

"auto-learn? no: scored as spam but learner indicated ham" is given if if ($learned_points < $learner_said_ham_points)where $learner_said_ham_points = -1.0 what exactly is learned_points -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/auto-learn-learned_points-tf3353775.html#a932685

Re: [2] best method for sa-learn

Thanks I think this is what I am looking for, have not had a chance to try it though. ram01 wrote: > > yes the learning folders are stored on the server. The same server is > running IMAP, MTA, and SA. The site does not have a high load of email, > so processor load shouldn'

autolearning

I understand the theory of not wanting to incorrectly learn messages. But my question is about that statements practicality in every situation. It makes sense with a diverse user base, say an ISP, but what about a small company with few users that are all competent to bot train and that will keep

Re: [2] best method for sa-learn

yes the learning folders are stored on the server. The same server is running IMAP, MTA, and SA. The site does not have a high load of email, so processor load shouldn't be a big issue, not to say that I don't care about efficiency. John D. Hardin wrote: > > On Thu, 1

Re: [2] best method for sa-learn

OK so if I have a global database but separate IMAP spame boxes how should i go about actually running sa-learn. from the cron point of view I would have to enum all the users and do /home/user/isSpam, /home/userb/isSpam, etc.I could also run it in procmail, this would run more often but on s

best method for sa-learn

What is the best way to run sa-learn with separate IMAP training folders per user, but global bayes database. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/best-method-for-sa-learn-tf3329149.html#a9256805 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.