Neil,
I'm sorry but I can't disclose the logs. fortunately 95% of them were
blocked by blacklisting or greylisting. I just wanted to know if other
people see a massive increase of spam the last weeks.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Alex skrev den 2013-06-12 20:25:
>
>
Dear list,
We see massive spamruns since begin june. Are other people also similar
runs? They fill our maillog. Fortunately most is blocked.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>>> polloxx, hit this URL; I remember seeing various patches for FuzzyOCR to
>>> address this.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.google.com/search?q=fuzzyocr+204
> polloxx, hit this URL; I remember seeing various patches for FuzzyOCR to
> address this.
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=fuzzyocr+2048+%22insecure+dependency%22+patch
>
Thanks John, I've read this before I posted my question on the ML.
> You said you're usin
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>>> Okay, no error with the test message.
>>>
>>> So far we haven't been able to reproduce the error.
>>>
>>> Is it still occurring in the live mai
> Okay, no error with the test message.
>
> So far we haven't been able to reproduce the error.
>
> Is it still occurring in the live mail stream?
Yes.
>
> Was this test message menually composed for testing purposes, or was it a
> real incoming message that had generated errors when processed?
> ...okay. What was the debugging output from that run?
>
See attachment.
> Does normal delivery run as root, or as a different user? If it runs as a
> different user, can that user perform the above manual test successfully?
>
Runs as root.
> Are you still seeing errors for normal mail deliv
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:18 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>>>
>>> OK. Just to be clear, you took a jpeg-format image file and used
>>> jpegtopnm
>>> to conver
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Sergey Tsabolov ( aka linuxman )
wrote:
>
>
> On 06/07/2011 06:34 μμ, polloxx wrote:
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Works fine at the CL.
>> Nothing about the error. (It's a SA error I think)
>> apt-get did not alter
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Brian Bebeau wrote:
>> after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
>> following error in the log:
>>
>> FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
>> [2048], skipping...
>
> I had this problem too, after upgrading SA to 3.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>> Works fine at the CL.
>
> OK. Just to be clear, you took a jpeg-format image file and used jpegtopnm
> to convert it to a pnm file, and got a correct .pnm image file out? Did you
&g
John,
Works fine at the CL.
Nothing about the error. (It's a SA error I think)
apt-get did not alter jpegtopnm.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>> nobody?
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, polloxx wrote
Sergey,
reinstall fuzzyocr did not help.
What should I see in the OSSpecificNotes?
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Sergey Tsabolov (aka linuxman)
wrote:
> Στις 06/07/2011 04:53 μμ, ο/η polloxx έγραψε:
>
> nobody?
>
> You are try to reinstall it ?
> See the notes here h
nobody?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, polloxx wrote:
> Dear,
>
> after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
> following error in the log:
>
> FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
> [2048], skipping...
>
> System
Dear,
after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
following error in the log:
FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
[2048], skipping...
System is a Debian Squeeze Running Spamassassin 3.3.1 and FuzzyOCR 3.6.0
Any idea?
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have deployed an mail receiving postfix server combined with amavisd (with
> clamAV and spamassassin) by using the reference:
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
>
> on a CentOS 5.5(64 bit) machine.
>
> Now I have deployed th
For future readers: rsyslog has it all:
http://www.rsyslog.com/doc/imfile.html
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:07 PM, polloxx wrote:
> Dear,
>
> Is it possible to log FuzzyOcr logs to syslog? As default config is
> using focr_logfile.
>
> Thx,
> P.
>
Dear,
Is it possible to log FuzzyOcr logs to syslog? As default config is
using focr_logfile.
Thx,
P.
Hi,
Is the spamassassin development dead?
On the website there's: 2008-06-12: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 has been released.
Hi,
Your Bayesian database has become dirty: too mush ham mails get a
score of BAYES_99, certainly for one of your customer domains.
Is there a way to sanitize the database without clear the whole thing?
What are the best practices to keep your Bayes database clean?
Thanks,
P.
Hi,
Am I right to say that picture spam has dropped dramatically since the
last months?
Is it still reasonable to run an orc plugin? I see the latest FuzzyORC
version is
not SA 3.2.x compatible. Are there more recent product compatible to 3.2.x?
Are you guys still running an ocr plugin on producti
I have another question concerning FozzyOcr 2.3b versus FuzzyOcr 3.5.1:
A spam picture like this: http://213.146.165.18/spam2.gif does generate
a SA FuzzyOcr score of 19 with version 2.3b (and gocr 0.40). With version 3.5.1
(and gocr 0.44) does not generate a score at all. I'm sure the
systems wo
22 matches
Mail list logo
