I can confirm the 80%:
Mail stats since: Mar 9 04:02:10
Total mail scanned:11335683
Total viruses stopped: 235807
Total spam found: 9016304
Spam percentage: 79.54
:-)
cheers
maurizio
On mer, 2007-10-17 at 12:07 -0400, James E. Pratt wrote:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Bart Schae
thanks again, very good and complete list of best practices !
cheers,
maurizio
On dom, 2007-09-23 at 22:53 +0200, mouss wrote:
> think it is good in the case of mass mailers.
> otherwise, "miscreants" may nuke your reputation. and if you send mail
> to hotmail, you'd better have S
cifically requested
> information from you in advance.
>
>
>
> mizzio wrote:
> > Thank you to everyone for the support.
> >
> > Maurizio
> >
> >
>
>
Thank you to everyone for the support.
Maurizio
On mer, 2007-09-19 at 08:17 -0700, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, mizzio wrote:
>
> > I'm setting up an SMTP server (centos + qmail) on a dell quad core
> > machine for sending out a periodic newsletter (
thank you for the "good luck" :-)
mizzio
On mer, 2007-09-19 at 12:32 +0200, Paolo Cravero wrote:
> mizzio wrote:
>
> > I'm setting up an SMTP server (centos + qmail) on a dell quad core
> > machine for sending out a periodic newsletter (10 millions a month
Thank you (very good reading).
Would you suggest postfix then ?
Thanks
Maurizio
On mer, 2007-09-19 at 12:30 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 19.09.07 12:07, mizzio wrote:
> > hello everybody,
> >
> > I apologize to ask an off-topic question, and feel free to poin
hello everybody,
I apologize to ask an off-topic question, and feel free to point me to
any other resources on the net.
I'm setting up an SMTP server (centos + qmail) on a dell quad core
machine for sending out a periodic newsletter (10 millions a month).
In order to avoid any possible blacklist
Hello everybody,
I don't know if this has been discussed before, but I can't find any
reference to my problem (sorry otherwise).
I'm running qmail with spamassassin 3.04, everything is working well,
except this kind of mail which is reported to have an higher score then
requested but it's not mar
Hi everybody,
I have been struggling with this problem for a while with no luck
(qmailscanner 1.24st + spamassassin 3.0.3).
Once in a while I get a message wich is correctly scanned but it is
delivered with this header:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?
This happens only sometimes with messag
Very nice solution for my needs.
Thank you !
maurizio
Il giorno mar, 24-05-2005 alle 13:08 -0400, Jim Maul ha scritto:
> mizzio wrote:
> > Hello guys,
> > sorry to bother you again: I didn't find a way to exclude this mailing
> > list from SA scanning in my setup.
&
Loren,
it works:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-56.2 required=4.5
X-Spam-Report: SA TESTS -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST_SA SA List 2.4 BAYES_50
BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4439]
One more question: I understand that in this way the mail are never
marked at spam, but they are auto
Hello guys,
sorry to bother you again: I didn't find a way to exclude this mailing
list from SA scanning in my setup.
I'm using qmail + qmail-scanner + spamassassin on my mailserver, the
only posts I found are about excluding the scanning with procmail (which
I'm not using).
I did not find a way o
Thank very much Loren.
regards,
mizzio
Il giorno lun, 23-05-2005 alle 04:51 -0700, Loren Wilton ha scritto:
> > - I get some messages marked as SPAM coming form this mailing list,
> > since the body contains URLs and text from real spam messages: do I have
> > to feed them
marked messages can
enforce the bayesian filtering ?
Thank you to everybody for your time and attention,
mizzio
14 matches
Mail list logo
