SPF fails now

Since I have moved my mailserver/spamassassin onto my gateway, SPF now fails on most messages, of which most are forwarded from my ISP's mailerver. Mail sent direct to my mailserver get SPF_PASS. E.g. marti.mine.nu saw a message coming from the IP address 62.253.162.47 which is mta07-svc.ntlworld.

SPF fails now

Since I have moved my mailserver/spamassassin onto my gateway, SPF now fails on most messages, of which most are forwarded from my ISP's mailerver. Mail sent direct to my mailserver get SPF_PASS. E.g. marti.mine.nu saw a message coming from the IP address 62.253.162.47 which is mta07-svc.ntlworld.

RE: Clam AntiVirus plugin for SpamAssassin 3.x

|> |I have a question here. Doesn't that require clamav to load |the virus signatures each time? If so, it would be pretty |inefficient and resource-hungry. Wouldn't the combination of |courier-maildrop/clamassassin and clamdscan be a lot faster |since the clamd daemon keeps the virus.db l

RE: PROCMAILRC problem

|-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 04 November 2004 18:31 |To: users@spamassassin.apache.org |Subject: PROCMAILRC problem | |Here is my procmailrc : | |=== |=== |LOGFILE=/v

RE: Automatic rejection

|-Original Message- |From: Moussa Fall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 04 November 2004 13:07 |To: users@spamassassin.apache.org |Subject: Re: Automatic rejection | |OK, now I have spamassassin, clamav, amavisd-new installed |with my RH9 and postfix. They all seem to work fine together.

RE: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up

|-Original Message- |From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 03 November 2004 18:58 |To: users@spamassassin.apache.org |Subject: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up | |Hi, |As much as I hate Outlook, I have to support it.. ugh.. | |Is there anyway to get the f

RE: Error after upgrading to 3.0.1

|-Original Message- |From: Keith Hackworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 02 November 2004 17:43 |To: marti |Cc: Spamassassin |Subject: RE: Error after upgrading to 3.0.1 | |This has nothing to do with .cf files. It is purely a problem |with running the wrong version of sa. | |Do this

RE: Error after upgrading to 3.0.1

|-Original Message- |From: Keith Hackworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 02 November 2004 16:57 |To: marti |Cc: Spamassassin |Subject: RE: Error after upgrading to 3.0.1 | | |When I got this error, it meant I had 2 copies of spamassassin |executable installed on my system with one set

RE: Error after upgrading to 3.0.1

| |Keith is right; the script is looking for the new scripts in |the old place. |Mine were in /usr/local/bin and /usr/bin. |Just move or copy the new scripts in the directory the old ones are in. | | I would if it had installed them in a different place but its not, I forgot to put the rules path

RE: Error after upgrading to 3.0.1

|-Original Message- |From: Keith Hackworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 02 November 2004 15:40 |To: marti |Cc: Spamassassin |Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to 3.0.1 | |> After upgrading from 3.0.0 to the latest version I get the following |> error:- |> |> ERROR!

RE: Error after upgrading to 3.0.1

|-Original Message- |From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 01 November 2004 23:17 |To: Spamassassin |Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to 3.0.1 | |On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:17:02PM -, marti wrote: |> ERROR! spamassassin script is v3.00, but using modu

Error after upgrading to 3.0.1

After upgrading from 3.0.0 to the latest version I get the following error:- ERROR! spamassassin script is v3.00, but using modules v3.01! Any idea what scrip its refering to, spamassassin --lint -D worked just fine, but cant fire up spamd. Martin

RE: Pardon the old messages

-Original Message- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 October 2004 13:31 To: SpamAssassin Users Subject: Pardon the old messages I fscked up and resent some old messages from April. Please discard those. Embarrassed, Jeff C. -- Well I'm quite new to this ma

RE: false positives from HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC and HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR rules

-Original Message- From: Mark Christoph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 October 2004 18:26 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: false positives from HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC and HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR rules We are running SA 3.0.1 site wide at my company and I had some false positives due

RE: Subject spam tag not working

rewrite_header subject **SPAM** this could have been better highlighted. but oh well... -- Many thanks, knew it was probably something simple but had spent too long readin the man pages, seems like they need updating Jim, I cant find in my CHANGES file the correct syntax it just says "...noted

Subject spam tag not working

I'm running SA 3.0.0 and have put the following in user_prefs & local.cf(restarted spamd):- rewrite_subject 1 subject_tag **SPAM** But still not getting the subject tagged, what am I missing? All was fine with the previous version. Martin

Bayes scores Don't seem right

I have just upgraded to V 3 and have noticed the bayes_99 scoring is a lot lower, checking out the scores shows the scores are lower(RHS) for 99 than 95 and that lower than 80, assuming this is wrong what should the scores be score BAYES_60 0 0 3.515 0.372 score BAYES_80 0 0 3.608 2.087 score BAYE

Dnsbl lookups not working since upgrade to 3.0.0

I am running suse 8.1 just upgraded from 2.64 everything works bar the dnsbl lookups, not had one positive result since upgrading. Is there some other perl modules I need to upgrade? Other than the perl-spamassassin-3.0.0-1.i586.rpm Martin