Inline. . .
List Mail User wrote:
...
jdow wrote:
From: "Aecio F. Neto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have been trying to post to this list using my original subscriber
email address.
Unfortunately, It has been not possible up to now.
I am using a per
Yeah, the reason not to block such is that DSN (Delivery Status
Notifications) are supposed to come in this way. If you block such,
your users will not be happy ... .
jay
Craig Jackson wrote:
Joao Gazzoni wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know how to block messages that come with a blank
sender
n the
box is useless :)
It does appear to be stable though with a script in cron killing off
the spamd processes and then restarting them. Not ideal though :)
Gav
On 12/11/04 3:18 AM, "jplesset" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, I see this, too,
3.0.
Yeah, I see this, too,
3.0.1. Solaris. iPlanet Messaging Server, using spamd.
I don't process a lot of mail, as I only have 5 users that accept mail
from the internet, and it's a small machine.
I use the startup line for spamd like this:
spamd -d --max-children=2 --max-conn-per-child=3
You are correct. I apologize.
jay
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 10:57 AM 11/8/2004, jplesset wrote:
I would advise against marking mails without "from" as spam.
Internet RFC requires that DSN (Delivery Status Notice) not have a
"from". So, if you eliminate such, you are droppin
I would advise against marking mails without "from" as spam.
Internet RFC requires that DSN (Delivery Status Notice) not have a
"from". So, if you eliminate such, you are dropping valid/useful mails.
jay
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 11:03 AM 11/8/2004 -0300, Leandro wrote:
How can I mark as spam mail
Perl 5.6.1. Solaris 9 SA 3.0.1
I'm set for 3 child processes, and have a round dozen. So far, they're
all anbout 20 megs.
jsy
Scott Palmer wrote:
My personal experience is when I start spamd it gets up to about 90M per
child within the 1st minute of running. It never gets any higher
Oban, the log entry you see does not appear to be "an error", but
confirmation of what you set. Child processes are killed off after
processing 3 messages. Then a new one is started. That's what you're
seeing.
jay
Oban Lambie wrote:
Ok, this seems to be a *lot* more stable from a memory sta
SA 3.0.1, yes.
So, because I see 11-12 processes, even with -m 3, what should I do
about it?
jay
Rick Macdougall wrote:
jplesset wrote:
Hopefully . . .
I'm still hovering around 11 spamd processes. it goes up to 15,
drops to 9, but seems to stay around 11 or so.
My server is much sm
Hopefully . . .
I'm still hovering around 11 spamd processes. it goes up to 15, drops
to 9, but seems to stay around 11 or so.
My server is much smaller than yours, and has only 256 megs of ram, so
it's kind of important to keep these things in line. . .
Sparc RAM is so expensive...
jay
Oban L
Oban, I'm having a somewhat similar issue, though a different environment.
SpamAssassin 3.0.1, Solaris 9, and iPlanet Messaigng 5.2p2. I find that
when I started spamd,with no special flags, other than -d, I got a large
number of spamd processes running. This number increased over about 20
min
You might be able to extract an original message from your mail server,
depending on what that is.
One of the reasons I installed iPlanet Messaging Server is so I can do
exactly that.
jay
Craig W. Shaver wrote:
You can import a .pst to outlook express and then export it to netscape.
Then
Hello,
all:
I have just upgraded from 2.63 to 3.0.1. Solaris 9, iPlanet Messaging
Server 5.2p2.
Everything appears to be working ok, except .. .
On startup, I get 4 spamd processes. This number increases with each
message I receive. I have set the max children to 2, and the
max-conn-pe
13 matches
Mail list logo
