Rob Wright wrote:
So far I've managed to run ~2500 messages through sa-learn over the course of
the last week or so, and I've yet to see a single log entry with a BAYES rule
match of any kind.
From your own logs:
[24761] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 0 ham(s) in bayes
DB < 100
(sorry if this is a dupe, had some weirdness on my end that made it look
like my original message was never sent?)
Hi all,
Using SA 3.2.0 on a shared hosting account via CPanel, with my
sa-trainer.cgi Perl script to call sa-learn with various parameters
which I'll get to in a second, to scan h
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.964 tagged_above=-100 required=5
> tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, HTML_30_40=0.463, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
To me, it looks like enough tokens were seen to flag it as BAYES_99, but
that the host and IP it came from didn't trigger any RBL hits, which
left your point score well
Hi all,
Using SA 3.2.0 on a shared hosting account via CPanel, with my
sa-trainer.cgi Perl script to call sa-learn with various parameters
which I'll get to in a second, to scan ham and spam from some Maildir
folders.
After scanning, the Perl script calls "sa-learn --dump magic" and parses
Thanks, Matt and Loren for your responses.
Since I'm hosting with a shared hosting environment company myself, I
was asking those questions more on a hunt for information so I could
suggest to my provider to allow it. But I definitely get Loren's warning
about having performance issues if pars
Hi all, long-time SpamAssassin user. I released an open-source web-based
training script for CPanel hosting users to train spam/ham based on
various configurations, and it's been very well received with a handful
of CPanel-based hosting groups that I've shown it to. Check out
http://iandouglas.
